Feel really guilty, my one family member gave me this. I don’t use much google stuff anymore and I really dislike the company as it gets more intrusive. Is there anything I can do with this thing besides give it away? Nothing is worse than getting a gift that you can’t use.

  • Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Give it (or sell it) to a person with disabilities. I have a disorder where my joints dislocate constantly, and if it wasn’t for my service dog, I would be screwed. The ability of these things to call 911 or other family members is awesome and can be life saving. I’ve even read about a woman who collapsed down the stairs and turned music up to wake up their partner. Gotta do what you’ve gotta do.

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Just sell it online and be honest when asked. Gifting culture is too guilt based, just do the sensible thing and plow through that ridiculous social barrier like a bulldozer.

    • POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah. I already informed them I don’t feel comfortable with it in the house. But I’m also the type to use TOR on all my devices. So I don’t know how paranoid that came off as.

      I think I am going to try to trace down where they got it from. I’m thinking Walmart so, they may take it without a receipt I hope.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The thing with gifts is to thank them for their intent, even if you tell them why you’re not going to keep the item.

        If you don’t succeed in returning it, you might also consider giving it to someone with a movement disability, for whom the assistance might outweigh the privacy issue.

        • POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          They are fantastic for the disabled. Everyone I know whonis disabled has the Amazon ones for some reason.

      • moseschrute@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Best to sell it. Since you use Tor you’re probably already on a watchlist

        • compostgoblin@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I’ve heard this a lot - is it just a common joke in privacy circles, or is anyone using Tor/Tails actually likely to be on a list?

          • moseschrute@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            I don’t really know what I’m talking about tbh, but my understanding is the more unique you make yourself, the easier you are to identify. For example, as soon as you use an ad blocker, your browser fingerprint becomes more unique because your average person doesn’t use an ad blocker. Even fewer people use Tor. So if someone knows you are using Tor, then they know you are 1 of maybe 100,000 people instead of millions (idk if those numbers are accurate, but you get the point).

            That being said, Tor does do a pretty good job of making you blend into all the other Tor users.

            But what I was talking about initially was mostly your ISP identifying your Tor traffic. So you use a VPN, but again you are now more unique than someone not using a VPN, even if your traffic is more encrypted.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        There is a stereo microphone and a camera in that thing. What good would Tor do in that case? That data would still make its way to google, unless you can root the whole thing and put a custom OS on it.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    We keep ours on a window sill behind a curtain. We have to yell at it 3 times to make it work, but it’s still better than looking under the couch for the tv remote.

    • POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I don’t have a TV. That’s why the nest thing is so odd. It does seem like it would bw fun to tinker around with.

      • Today@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s handy - turn on/off lights, adjust thermostat, set reminders (like to remember cat medicine) or cooking timers. We had the Google one but switched to the Alexa one So i could ‘drop in’ on my mom and set it to call me if she said HELP.

    • manicdave@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It might* be worth trying this and installing home assistant.

      *I say might because I just got some IoT stuff on sale and installed home assistant before realising there’s nothing useful in home automation except zoned heating. Fun to play with though, I guess.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      20 hours ago

      What thought? They clearly know nothing about OP and didn’t put any actual thought in. Lol

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I work in IT and my whole family knows I’m privacy centric. None of them would have even thought about the privacy concerns with a smart speaker. That doesn’t mean that they don’t know me, it’s that they are ignorant to tech and cyber security. It’s not a stretch to think that OP’s gift giver knows OP will enough to give them an expensive gift but didn’t think of all of the implications, because that’s foreign to them.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Every time I talked about privacy concerns with these devices on Reddit, I got a deluge of “oh they don’t listen all the time” and “oh they don’t send anything home”. Insanity.

          I received one as a gift years ago and it’s still in the box. I should give it to someone.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yeah, exactly. Zero thought.

          “Oh, techy thing! Perfect for techy person!”
          Absolute brainless gift.

          • BassTurd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            14 hours ago

            That’s different than not knowing anything about OP. That’s not knowing tech or not knowing extreme specifics about OP. The giver knows OP well enough that they thought a tech gift fits them, which makes sense. Most people don’t think twice about smart devices and security because most people are ignorant.

            There may have been lots of thought put into the gift, like OP likes tech, perhaps they’re into music, maybe they have a Google phone, or they have lots of fancy gadgets. A popular smart speaker sounds like a good gift for that person to someone that’s not security minded.

      • Mesophar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Someone close enough to be expected to gift, but distant enough to not know them well and only know “they like techy stuff”.

        Like, I get that it isn’t the best gift for OP, and I dont presume to know their relational status with the gift giver, but there are plenty of ways this could be a well-intentioned thoughtful gift that just didn’t hit the mark…

      • POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That’s what my friend said too. I work in the tech industry, but gosh do I find it creepy more and more. And if you talk about it being pervasive, you get called paranoid.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yeah, it’s super creepy. We’re literally harvested for data to be sold for profit. Disgusting.

    • Roopappy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I don’t even trust that. Google devices hard-code DNS and IPs and… I have no evidence or knowledge of it, but I assume that they have some Sidewalk-like ability to communicate directly to other Google devices to get outside the network you want them to be on.

  • gila@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Tell it to shut the fuck up (it works, that’s why my grandfather likes it)