• Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    Crows are self-aware just like humans

    “Oh no, is my plumage too dark? Were the other crows laughing with me or at me? Is my crowing too high pitched? Was that raven offended when I mistook him for a crow?”

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Same for Parrots, corvids and parrots are in the IQ level of dolphins and big simios. But there are also other animals with self awareness (mirror test), eg Elephants, Manta Rays, Octopus and even Ants. Many animals are much more intelligent than was thought a few years ago and self-awareness is surely present in most of them and also a minimum of intelligence, because they are an essential faculties for the will to survive.

    Even bees are smart enough to recognize and difference a human face, jumping spiders can plan different strategies to hunt their prey

    https://tube.kuylar.dev/watch?v=UDtlvZGmHYk

    https://tube.kuylar.dev/watch?v=H4JfRrOPKlE

    https://www.animalcognition.org/2015/04/15/list-of-animals-that-have-passed-the-mirror-test/

  • Barabas [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    One of my pastimes as an incredibly lonely teenager was just observing jackdaws, crows and magpies. You can tell that they actually think before acting which is fascinating.

    Also jackdaws have very pretty eyes.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    this is very interesting but how the fuck did they figure this out? i skimmed the article and its vague on what would be the coolest details.

    • Poogona [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      One common test is the famous “mirror test” where an animal is given some problem that can only be solved by using its own reflection in a mirror for reference, such as a study involving an Australian ant. They put a blue dot made of felt (I think) on the ant’s head behind the antennae, and watched the ant clean itself once it saw that it’s reflection had a weird blue thing on its head. But I don’t know if there are other tests for “self awareness”

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem with that test is that not all animals process visual information the same.

        For example, rats have horrible vision but two noses, one just for smelling pheromones. I’m quite positive my rats are self-aware being highly social animals with a theory of mind.

        But they’ll never pass a mirror test.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          Right, if an animal passes the test that’s a strong indication of self awareness, but if it doesn’t then consciousness cannot be ruled out. I would imagine most animals are self aware at least on some level because being able to model oneself within your environment is a useful property. Any organism with a relatively sophisticated internal model would naturally have itself as part of its model.

          • treefrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah, I think self awareness is a really low bar that we tend to think we’re special for having. And that this fallacy is part of why animal rights are basically shit.

            The mirror test does show that an animal is self-conscious, in the sense that, it likely cares what others think and thus has a theory of mind. And you’re right, it only proves self-consciousness, it doesn’t prove its lack because as I stated earlier in the case of my rats, other senses might be involved that would produce that response.

            Dogs too. Seem much more concerned with how each other smell than how each other look.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              I never really understood why the default assumption is that consciousness is something unique to humans and we should default to assuming other animals are not conscious as opposed to the other way around.

            • treefrog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              All forms of consciousness but, yes, most especially self-awareness. A lot of people really aren’t that self-aware compared to a Zen Master. And an earthworm is less self-aware than most people.

        • Zerush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The mirror test is certainly somewhat debatable in determining the degree of self-awareness and intelligence. For this reason, today it is determined not only with this, but with a set of tests that includes the general ability to solve problems to determine the intellectual capacity of an animal. It is always the question if the animal does not correspond to the mirror test, if it is due to lack of understanding, lack of interest or other reasons, little childs also don’t pass the mirror test. It is to find out if the animal knows exactly what it is doing.

  • Moonworm [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    My dad was telling me earlier about how these crows have been hanging around our house and he saw some squirrels trying to chase them off.

    • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      www.popularmechanics.com

      Crows Are Self-Aware Just Like Humans, And They May Be as Smart as Gorillas

      Caroline Delbert

      5 - 6 minutes


      • In a 2020 study, crows performed a complex task that involved hundreds of firing sensory analytical neurons.
      • Crows can do jobs, share knowledge, and even ritualistically mourn their dead.
      • Recent research suggests crow brains tightly pack neurons to help make them smart.

      Crows are extremely intelligent. They can use tools to get what they want, like New Caledonian crows in a single South Pacific island of the same name, which shape twigs into hooks to catch grubs from rotting logs. And according to new research, crows are even smarter than we thought.

      ****Crows and other corvids (a family of birds that includes ravens and magpies) “know what they know and can ponder the content of their own minds,” according to a 2020 study in Science**. **This is considered a cornerstone of self-awareness and shared by just a handful of animal species beside humans, such as monkeys and great apes. Crows can also use their complex brains to find creative solutions, such as dropping nuts on the road so passing cars can crack them open, for example.

      But do they have true consciousness?

      Crows Have Brains Packed With Neurons

      The ability to think through a problem and work out an answer may be due to crows possessing a high number of brain cells that process information. This trait appears not only in humans, but in non-human primates, too. A study published in the Journal of Comparative Neurology in January 2022 comparing corvid brains with those of chickens, pigeons, and ostriches found that corvid brains have more tightly packed neurons—between 200 and 300 million neurons per hemisphere—enabling efficient communication between the brain cells. Crow intelligence is at least on par with some monkeys, and in fact, may be closer to that of great apes (like gorillas), according to a 2017 study published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

      Evolution Gave Crows Great Ability to Reason

      In the 2020 study, scientists put crows through a series of puzzling tasks. The researchers measured neural activity in different kinds of neurons with the goal of tracking how crows were sensing and reasoning through their work. They sought to study a specific kind of thinking, called sensory consciousness, and they chose birds in particular as representative of a branching point in the evolutionary tree of life. The task is simple, but involves some high-level brain stuff, as described in the study:

      After the crow initiated a trial … a brief visual stimulus of variable intensity appeared… After a delay period, a rule cue informed the crow how to respond if it had seen or had not seen the stimulus. [A] red cue required a response for stimulus detection (“yes”), whereas a blue cue prohibited a response for stimulus detection.

      The researchers write that sensory consciousness is the ability to have subjective experiences that can be “explicitly accessed and thus reported,” and that it comes from brains that have evolved over time. Consciousness is associated primarily with the primate cerebral cortex. Bird brains are different, “since they diverged from the mammalian lineage 320 million years ago,” the researchers write.

      However, the crows performed in a way that affirms their sensory consciousness, which scientists in the 2020 study say could mean the “neural correlates of consciousness” date back to at least the last time birds and mammals shared that brain section:

      To reconcile sensory consciousness in birds and mammals, one scenario would postulate that birds and mammals inherited the trait of consciousness from their last-common ancestor. If true, this would date the evolution of consciousness back to at least 320 million years when reptiles and birds on the one hand, and mammals on the other hand, evolved from the last common stem-amniotic ancestor.

      In an analysis in the same issue of Science, another researcher, Suzana Herculano-Houzel of Vanderbilt University, makes a critique of the study’s hypothesis. The structure being studied, she says, could resemble another structure because of physical properties more than a shared evolution or an indication of extremely early consciousness. The size of the structures matter a great deal, too.

      “[T]he level of that complexity, and the extent to which new meanings and possibilities arise, should still scale with the number of units in the system,” Herculano-Houzel explains. “This would be analogous to the combined achievements of the human species when it consisted of just a few thousand individuals, versus the considerable achievements of 7 billion today.”

      Either way, crows have bird brains they can be proud of.

      Headshot of Caroline Delbert

      Caroline Delbert is a writer, avid reader, and contributing editor at Pop Mech. She’s also an enthusiast of just about everything. Her favorite topics include nuclear energy, cosmology, math of everyday things, and the philosophy of it all. 

      This content is imported from OpenWeb. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    experiment proposal:

    a population of crows in a shared space.

    one crow is selected and brought to another area where the rest cannot see or hear what happens.

    In the other area, the crow is placed into a box where a distinctive sound plays, and then a spurt of cold water sprays. Alternatively, something that is not injurious, but annoying and unpleasant.

    The crow is then removed from the box and marked non-invasively somehow, such as with nontoxic washable dye.

    The crow is finally put back into the same space with the other crows.

    Another crow is then selected from the population, ensuring that it is not one that has been marked, and the process is repeated.

    IS THERE a point at which the crows begin to respond pre-emptively to the distinctive sound that foreshadows the unpleasant stimulus?

    If so, how long does this change of behavior take to manifest in individuals who did not directly experience the unpleasant stimulus?

    The goal is to see if a crow will TELL the others about its experiences and what to expect, which requires the ability to communicate abstract and hypothetical information.

    i would expect that if we performed this experiment on cats and dogs, etc, we would never actually see individuals from the general population learning to anticipate what’s coming via abstract communication from their peers… but I do expect that such information WOULD eventually be taught to the entire community.

    has such an experiment already been performed?

    • meyotch@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That’s a reasonable design. The result would be interesting and may raise more questions than it answers. That is a good thing.

      I don’t think this design would conclusively prove they were engaging in abstract communication, but that would take many experiments of similar scope.

      A sceptic could say the unconditioned group reaction was a result of social awareness of the reaction of the conditioned crows. Sort of a collective freak out based on the immediate reaction of the marked individuals.

      Regardless, I hereby tender my application to be colony manager of the research group. Murder Manager is the title I would choose.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Maybe you could instead make it a puzzle type of thing, like “you have a set of 4 buttons, only 1 gives you a treat, and the crow can only choose 1 button”. Then see what happens

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It could be explained by simply an increasing level of stress in the murder. Stress is transmissible. How would you control for that?