• 9cpluss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In two years they can get the award for “best ongoing game” then, just like Cyberpunk :D

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        God, what a dick sucking award. Cyberpunk may be playable now, but it did fuck all to deserve that.

        Better games launched excellent and got better with age. Launching to get removed from online stores and taking years to reach playable is not the best ongoing anything.

        • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It truly was a Great Gamer Gaslighting after that anime was released. Suddenly, cyberpunk was a work of art and everyone wanted to revisit it to see places from the anime. They hadn’t even done much to fix it yet at that point, and may even have still been dealing with legal stuff from all the stuff they promised that wasn’t in the game.

          The PR turn around with that game was wild to watch, it happened almost overnight. And Gamerz TM did it to themselves.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thank corporate morons forcing devs to the door to meet ridiculous timelines, they don’t give a fuck if it’s ready or not.

      I’m a SWE and my manager would tell me shit like “even Apple pushed out the iPhone with some bugs”, “at some point you have to wrap it and ship it”, etc. Mgmt uses this bullshit to feel better about their (or their bosses) poorly balanced priorities and decisions.

      It’s all about announce early, bag as much interest and money as possible and then ship it regardless if it’s reached the definition of done or not (you better believe mgmt will throw those goalposts around as they see fit)

      Pre-ordering morons hold some blame here as well as they play right into the bullshit I’m talking about

    • idiocracy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      why the surprise? as long as people keep buying they will try to squize more money for less effort.

    • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The worst part is that I’ve played early access games that have more shit going for them than Starfield

  • malchior@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Glad to see they’re still improving it. When I get the Ultra Game of the Year Turbo Deluxe edition for $20 in years to come, I no doubt will enjoy it.

  • ACardboardRaven@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    oh boy, now i get to enjoy… basic features that should have been there at launch?

    seems this is a recurring thing nowadays. i pray to god fable 4 doesn’t suck the big one.

      • thesmokingman@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Peter Molyneux is not involved with the project or studio so there’s actually a chance we might have both reasonable expectations and promises delivered. I had to google around to make sure; initially I was going to link some stuff about how trusting Molyneux is really dumb.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Instead it’s a title made by a studio that’s about 3 levels removed from the original creators.

  • ieightpi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nakey Jakey recently did a super indepth video on what is wrong with Starfield. And suffice it to say, I’ve removed the game from my wishlist. There’s betterr games to spend my money on.

    • WatTyler@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you too have an unhealthy relationship with absurdly long video essays, I’d point you in the direction of PatricianTV’s Starfield analysis.

        • WatTyler@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re very welcome. If you get the chance, let me know what you thought of it.

      • saze@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I desperately want to watch his 8 hour analysis of Starfield but am scared of the commitment.

        • WatTyler@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Advice for consumption Patrician himself posted on his 24-hr Skyrim analysis:

          • Use the YouTube chapters.
          • Play it in the background or on a second monitor.
          • Don’t rely on YouTube accurately tracking your progress through the vid. Comment a timestamp to use as a bookmark instead.
    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s almost always better to wait on Bethesda titles and buy the goty/complete edition a few years later.

      • ieightpi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe it’s time to just stop giving Bethesda money all together. Or until they start releasing games when they’re finished.

        Guess that could be said about any AAA company though

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Man, if they release a “pokemon emerald” version of starfield and slap a goty title on it, that just confirms the company only breathes in order to try and blow smoke up our asses

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think people would hate it again, seeing how they hated Starfield that is also procedural.

      • Lesrid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’d have to change Daggerfall so that you can’t run, only fast travel, between dungeons and cities to truly mirror the Starfield experience.

  • qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    The main feature I want is better optimization. It’s really not good still and I’ve played with the settings more than I wanted to

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Last months patch did a lot for optimization, especially on the cpu and non amd gpu builds, seeing double digit gains.

  • Kaldo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d say “i will pick it up on a sale in a year or two” but they’re just going to release the enhanced / special / anniversary / superspace edition down the line too, so why bother

    • TheMinions@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I let my Gamepass lapse and was considering re-upping it to play Starfield. And now I am for sure not going to re-up it for Starfield. Maybe I’ll visit it in a few years, but it sounds like not a great time from Nakey Jakey’s review on it.

        • TheMinions@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Just the fact that the ship combat is awful AND you don’t get to fly your ship TO other planets makes this a pass for me.

  • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t bought Starfield, was waiting for sub-$25. If there are no mods, I’m lowering that to sub-$10.

    • ieightpi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously what a clusterfuck of a game this has been. I’m so happy I didn’t bite and buy it yet.