• Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Although I’d love to agree superslicer has sadly nowhere near the development power of prusa behind them - and feature parity is rarely given, basically any release of the two has “oh I want both of those!” (don’t know if it’s spelled correctly but arachnid mode for example was hyped to a point I checked back with prusa after a few months).

      I just want to point it out in case people expect a “prusaslicer” but better in every regard :)

        • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I can’t answer that and it’s a valid question in my opinion. If I had to guess I’d speculate about disagreements in code style, build pipeline or similar.

          • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Thats usually how it goes. Imo, and to be clear im a major foss person, they are contributing so they should accept the prusaslicer guidelines but maybe have an open discussion about.

            I havent seen the prusaslicer code yet so i have no how bad either project is though :p

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh yeah, I find that it’s easier to get fine control of the outcome in SuperSlicer because it’s less refined. User-friendly features are nice when you’re getting started but a hindrance when you have more experience. I tried to use Cura awhile back and it felt like the Fisher-Price version of a slicer. SuperSlicer is probably less accessible overall, but it doesn’t hide controls from me.