Got it. Then the bad news is that when with a diagnosis you’ll have a more of trial and error in front of you. The good news is that man’s of the structural behavioral tools die ADHD will help non ADHD people as well as at their core they work against overburdening the brain.

I think you over worry then die a simple reason: There meds will be clear in few days, a therapist will find ways to help you and you will find things that work for you!

Actually the medication is one of the cleanest diagnostics tools in my opinion: if they give you energy and push you up then your brain did its job already. If they call you down and provide focus then they (literally) filled the gaps in the brain.

Hey friend,

Honestly I don’t understand what the difference would be for you.

There’s no badge or membership. Personally I had three benefits of my diagnosis (which is two decades back by now and was as an adult):

I had an easier time understanding my own brain and… Well world perception.

I was able to easier look for help and talk about it.

I was able to test medication (didn’t work our for me back then she took side effects but that’s a different story).

To get a strangers “judgment”: If you just want an excuse for your low energy and failing here and there you don’t have it. If you want guidance and new approaches to improve your life for yourself and then here’s your diagnosis: one of us!

Either way I wish you the best :)

Seems like a historic artefact to me as well. And one of their mentioned points was “no sync via http” which even for 2006 makes me… hesitant.

And their history section ends in 2007, couldn’t find a feature comparison in their quick start guide.

Yay a rabbit hole! Thanks for the key words :)

Can you give a link or description how anarchy counts be implement in a easy there is resilient to a subverted centralization of power that does not truly on an active majority?

Because we don’t have that, sadly. And I’ve never seen a concept that takes a silent and passive majority into consideration.

This is a twisting of your words to make you smile, not to offend :)

You identify with the person so arrogant that he tried to cheat not only the gods but death himself, putting the whole of mortal existence in danger - while disliking the hottest bisexual in existence who was tricked into not knowing what reflections were - and then tragically thinking that he met the hottest sea creature in existence!

Kann das von einem Spenden Keks Verkauf anekdotisch berichten: Stundenlohn im unteren einstelligen Bereich sind realistisch und haben keinen interessiert, weil das Backen ja Spaß machte.

Wenn ich das Volumen angucke, dass hört bei uns privat gebacken wird, dann muss ich aber eher an die Bäckerei, die immer "Wolf"ruft denken, um Mal Märchen zu bemühen…

The cheapest framework is nearly five times the OPs link.

While “no laptop” is better than a HP I don’t see this link as helpful as all.

OP, I would check out used markets in this price range. While frameworks are awesome I haven’t seen them being refurbished yet and you regularly have business leasing returns from Lenovo for example that could match your budget.

Haha my association is “ah damn but I didn’t wanna build a hospital! I’ll just take those people and material and we’ll build a the night awesome cemetery ever!”.

Dunno why my mind went there but I’ll have to thank you for that!

One thing to point out: it doesn’t say “elected”.

In theory it might be just the best leading person for a role.

That in itself is the most complex issue in my opinion: where do leaders come from and how do you make sure that they don’t overstay their need? It’s an unresolved issue and democracy is our best answer yet, in my opinion.

Nicht der OP, wollte nur danke sagen! Bin gar nicht auf die Idee gekommen, das Urteil selber zu lesen, warum auch immer…

Mir ging es um die Formulierung im Gesetz, dass das dem nicht folgen muss (fälschlicherweise, meiner Meinung nach). Die Relation dazu ist ja die Verwendung einer Waffe im Kontext physischer Gewalt. Das ist einfach zu wage formuliert, wenn der Text wäre “mittelbaren Einfluss auf die Gesundheit nimmt” oder ähnliches würde sich die Frage nicht stellen.

Für die, die nicht selber suchen aber sich eine Meinung bilden wollen:

(8) Auf Freiheitsstrafe nicht unter fünf Jahren ist zu erkennen, wenn der Täter

1. bei der Tat eine Waffe oder ein anderes gefährliches Werkzeug verwendet oder

2. das Opfer

   a) bei der Tat körperlich schwer misshandelt oder

   b) durch die Tat in die Gefahr des Todes bringt.

Quelle https://www.buzer.de/177_StGB.htm

Wieso? Machen es doch richtig: Das ist der Gesetzestext, hier die Bedeutung, dieses Thema gehört nicht in diese Schublade.

Hier muss der Gesetzgeber nachbessern, nicht das Gericht.

Bitte nicht aus Versehen die Gewaltenteilung untergraben, nur will ein (naja eher zwei) Arme ihren Job nicht in unserem Sinne machen…

Not Op here, from what I’ve read is that the answer to that question is unknown but he showed a significant tolerance for some. Does that make it himself fine? In my book: yes.

For me personally it was enoughto leave the project behind as it’s so closely tied to the person.

That’s a call everyone needs to do for themselves though if course

Lemmy.world is blocked by beehaw as well…

How about “what I want is beyond my comprehension”?

That’s quite often my default…

For me it’s very simple: NSFW can’t have a general acceptable definition because it depends on culture, background and personal beliefs. There is no way for a collection of communities to have a common definition and even if they would have: enforcement and interpretation is still done by volunteers.

Therefore All is never safe for work unless I know that my tolerance is lower than all communities within lemmy AND I’m fine with an accidental penis or breast due to human error.

I don’t hate that much but I don’t watch him because of the shady selling business hr often does and apparent sponsored content which is not always disclosed (been a while but his channel misrepresented graphics cards benchmarks for example).

It’s like the British yellow press for me: his face alone is enough to discredit the quality of the source. Could it be good? Sure! Will I ever find out? Not anymore.

Wow thanks a lot for that!

Ich würde eher sagen, dass das bürokratisch Deutsch ist für “wtf wollt ihr von uns? Die Deppen im Parlament machen uns andere Vorgaben, an die müssen wir uns halten”.

So lese ich zumindest den letzten Satz.

Nehme ich immer noch als Ausrede wahr im Sinne von “ich muss doch da nicht drüber nachdenken, sollen die mir andere Vorgaben machen!”.

Der Unterschied für mich: der systemische Rassismus ist aus Bequemlichkeit, das Namensrecht nicht an zu fassen. Finde ich noch… trauriger.