• afk_strats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Notepad++ works fine on Wine on Mac and Linux. After being away from it from awhile, I realized I don’t need it anymore. I would often use the column edit mode and recorded macros, but I just bash script those now. I guess I’m a different person now?!?

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      so many people nostalgic for a text editor.

      yeah it was my go to editor for code in ye olden days of programming and using windows.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      i knew i recognized the name somewhere earlier today when i learned about it, but i couldn’t remember how until i saw this; i was forced to use it because of windows a while back.

      i remember liking it too.

  • lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Dude, I miss the days of using Notepad++ in windows.

    I mean, Kate is better, but it does not have that same I’m using it in highschool feeling that Notepad++ does.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      As someone who switched from npp to Kate in the past year and change, I think npp is way better out of the box. Kate is like a multitool that you need to tweak a lot.

    • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I actually just used it this weekend! On my airgapped Win XP machine. College vibes, very nostalgic.

    • jaxxed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I don’t understand the helix approach.

      Let’s build a new editor in rust (good), that is in the legacy of vim/nvim[/emacs] (good), that moves to resolve the backwards mechanics of the vim-syntax like meow (good) … but let’s build it all as built in features with no modularity ???

      How can you build a new terminal editor like vim/nvim/emacs without realizing that the core strength is that the best features are delivered in plugins. Why would you try to write all of the functionality yourself? Why would you think that a small team can handle all of the work? How can you not realize that external contributors in vim/emacs are the source of the most interesting functionality?

      I liked helix, almost as much as emacs w/ meow, but yiu xan’t extend it, or write a plugin.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I suppose you can question the approach, but I personally can’t argue against the results. I’ve been using it professionally and privately for almost two years and it rocks. I haven’t had a need for plugins yet.

  • m532@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Notepad++ is ukraine shills, i’d guess they’re like hotznplotzn (western propagandists that always post clearly fabricated lies and almost always target china)