It’s a good’n!

membrane kbs suck

Matter of opinion. I kind of like them in a way.

Once you’re into mechanical

Choc switches on my Voyager are (low profile) mechanical switches. 🤷‍♂️ Just not clicky. I also have a WASD V3 keyboard with Cherry silent reds. They were aight, I guess.

I’ll just say: you can definitely practice enough with any kind of keyboard switches and get your muscle memory up to a point where the clicky feedback doesn’t really give much of a benefit. Surely when it comes to raw speed, the tactile feedback is negligible. But I’m sure it has a large impact on typing fatigue. I’ve noticed with the choc switches that my fingers are much less tired after work. There is very little travel. And the ergonomics of a column-staggered split keyboard are amazing.

lol yeah, nobody touches my $500+ keyboard without washing their hands first.

The tactile feedback of the clickly-clacky keys lets me type faster.

I’m curious about this one. Could you elaborate? I’m on low profile choc switches (the ZSA Voyager), and I feel like going back to high profile or clicky would not be something I’d want to do again.

I know, I just don’t understand the appeal. I want my keys to be thocky.

You haven’t lubed your switches enough?!?

I guess that’s one of the reasons why it was spoken of for so long — the fact that it remained somewhat accurate for longer than expected.

But anyone who is a computer scientist or programmer or anything close to that should know that continuing to double anything grows out of hand very quickly, even if you double it only once a year. 😅

So even if it would’ve been called “Moore’s thingamabob”, it was never really intended as a real theory? It was only like, tongue-in-cheek the whole time?

Kind of rude? It feels like it’s close, no?

Could you explain in detail why it isn’t? Because from what I see:

1. The curve was accurate for some time, but innovation doesn’t really follow mathematical formulas, so the thesis would seem preposterous in hindsight, to me anyway.
2. The appeal to tradition fallacy seems to be defined as just that? — Just because it’s been like that for some time doesn’t really necessarily mean it’s true. Right?

Why is this lack of reading comprehension? Please explain, if you would. Thank you kindly.

Diabetes? #NotADoctor

Absolute terror state

Who brings proof of citizenship anywhere? I don’t even think my driver’s licence works for that purpose.

Not in your code perhaps, which is a good thing 👍

But if the element itself already had an inline opacity value, that would be lost. 🙂

How it should be.

It did kind of give that alpha stage vibe, but if it was like a few bucks, it probably buy it. It was a remake after all, with slightly better graphics.

True

You’re right, the AI stole it indirectly. But you know what I mean. :⁠-⁠P

AI coders be like

I thank you for your service