• LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t claim to really understand what the purpose of state atheist policies is, perhaps someone can ELI5 It me, but at least It seems fair honestly, as:

    The school is part of the GO! network, which has a general ban on wearing religious symbols.

    If it was a ban explicitly on Muslim headscarves it’d be discriminatory. Another question is whether this will be enforced in equal measure on a white kid wearing a cross though…

    • solo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      If it was a ban explicitly on Muslim headscarves it’d be discriminatory.

      It’s a bit trickier than that. In France schools are secular by law. In principal this is great. In practice chistians never had an issue wearing their cross neckless, even in a visible manner. Muslim girls from conservative families on the other hand can be forced to quit school at a young age, since they are not allowed to wear a scarf there.

            • solo@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              It’s intersectional.

              It was coined in 1989 by professor Kimberlé Crenshaw to describe how race, class, gender, and other individual characteristics “intersect” with one another and overlap.

              [Edit: Even tho race is not a scientific thing anymore, we had this narrative for so long that the term is still in use. At least it is used as a social construct. And we struggle as societies with racism. Still]

              • Iceblade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                So?

                Religion is a choice, an unverifiable one at that. There is no reason that such a choice should grant special privileges that someone non-religious, or of another religion would not be granted. Each such request must stand on its own merit.

                In Europe the concept of freedom from religion is something that many different cultures have fought hard for - secularism.

      • Landsharkgun@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Seems self-defeating to me. Most effective way to fight radical religosity is to educate people. Let em go to school and half of them will be ex-Muslim by college.

        • solo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Let them go to school

          are you talking to the parents?

          and half of them will be ex-Muslim by college

          Have you seen this happening for christians? They pretty much all go to school.

          • Landsharkgun@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Nah, the government. Trying to de-radicalize people with ingrained beliefs is hard and unlikely. Accept the parent’s wierd beliefs, let the kids go to school wearing whatever the parents want, and you get much less radical kids out the other end.

            Yah, every graph of % of religious people is trending solidly down.