• Granixo@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    CPU: OK ✅

    RAM: OK ✅

    GPU: OK ✅

    Storage: WTF 🤯

    Sound Card: The time has come and so have i 🎵😎

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bought include both storage for downloaded compressed archives and then to unpack before deleting them?

        I’ve run into this when updating games where I have the game installed and enough space for the update but not enough for that middle ground when it’s getting unpacked

      • deus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s much more reasonable, I don’t even have 85GB available. Why would they recommend that much storage?

        • cheeki@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe a dev just right click propertied their folder and typed that in haha. I think it’s probably downloaded and cached community content. Unless it’s a hint at new danger zone stuff

          • Jontique@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            My guess is that the shown number is the storage requirements when they add the war games maps and Danger Zone maps

        • Granixo@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My guess is future proofing.

          AKA Subtly forcing users to buy more storage real state 💾💵

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, I have that, but 85GB of space? I need some space left to store my offline backup of Wikipedia.

  • warmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just played a match, it’s working perfectly on Wayland and pipewire. I’m using -vulkan as a launch parameter.

  • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Especially VK_EXT_graphics_pipeline_library is interesting. This means mesa 23.1 or higher on AMD GPU’s is a must. Iirc Nvidia supports vk gpl for a year or so.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That just says recommended - you likely get frame stutter without GPL but the game would probably smooth out after 5 minutes or so.

          • bery@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            True. Recently I updated my 1050ti graphics driver on my dads windows machine and it now runs valorant at 120 FPS instead of being locked to 60 to not drop frames too often

        • Linus_Torvalds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks! I just ran vulkaninfo and it’s there. Btw: You can check your version apparently with vulkaninfo | grep driverInfo.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The gpu supports gpl, but it depends on yoir distro and how Steam is installed which mesa version you have. What’s you distro release? Native package manager or flatpa?

  • Koffiato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder if it has a native Vulkan renderer now or it just has DXVK baked in. If the latter, bad news is it halves my framerate İN CS2LT on Windows.