• OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Does anyone here own capital? As in being haut bourgeoisie? Probably not.

      If you support capitalism and you’re not a capitalist you’re just a bootlicker.

  • MenKlash@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Tell me how you don’t know the difference between corporatocracy and capitalism without telling me how you don’t know the difference between corporatocracy and capitalism.

  • Kiosfriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    mincing me into fertilizer instead of making me sell their crap at 5k% markup gets them more money how?

    • magnetosphere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This way, they have a product to sell. The next tool to come along is hired as the salesman (no salary, 100% commission).

    • Hegar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      People think capitalists care nothing except their net value but that’s an unfair stereotype.

      What’s the use of having all the money if you can’t make other people suffer? How else will the poors know you’re better than them?

    • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’d recommend posting a tangentially political meme at some point on Lemmy.

      The amount of people who will come out of the woodwork to tell you ‘don’t post this’ and ‘don’t make things political’ will really be eye opening.

      People don’t want to address systemic issues and think not talking about them is a viable solution.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Don’t even have to go THAT far, I get called a commie for saying a 40 hour work week should provide basic shelter these days. 🤷

          If we want to live in boring reality, it doesn’t happen a LOT but way more than it should.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I mean that was and is a basic communist agitating point, you might be closer to a communist than you think.

            • Facebones@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I don’t know if this is supposed to be snarky or not but I’ve accepted a while ago that I’m definitely some version of “leftist.”

              I don’t see myself that way necessarily but capitalists are drawing their line in the sand so far to the right that it is what it is lmao

  • trailing9@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s the other way round. The fear of being left out makes the lemmies dance off a cliff.

    (I know, the movie was fake.)

    The capitalist sees that the lemmies keep dancing without wondering why the music is playing.

      • trailing9@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Let’s call the capitalists on the yachts billionaires.

        I am defending the capitalistic view that markets are key to wealth distribution. Socialists and communists agree. That’s why they want to replace them.

        My point is that there needs to be competition on all markets. There must be enough housing that rent becomes cheap.

        For that to happen, lemmies have to vote for politicians who change zoning laws to allow cheap housing.

        Instead I see lemmies having fun with revolutions, new technologies and debates about the inclusion of anarchists. Those are all beautiful dancing partners but they won’t reduce rent because there won’t be a revolution.

  • bobble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wealth redistribution is good. Socialism definitely could end up being better than capitalism with the right implementation and regulations. A socialist revolution is a bad idea; wealth redistribution can be implemented in capitalism. Lobbying is real, but voting still makes a difference. Vote in more than just the presidential election and canvas for issues or politicians you support. Thank you for coming to my ted talk.

      • bobble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        progress isnt a continous upward climb in the short term. In the 90s crime shot up and no gay marriage soooo. We can definitely go farther with capitalism like with higher taxes on the rich, minimum base income, etc. Voting does matter, if you dont vote you have no leverage over those who speak for you.

    • gayhitler420@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Are you though?

      Do you own the means of production and employ people to operate it, paying them a fraction of the value their labor produces?

      Are you able to live comfortably without working for the foreseeable future? Do you exert outsized control over municipal, regional and state government far beyond your “vote” if you live in a place that claims to be a democracy? Does that control come from your power over the means of production that you control?

      Supporting a society controlled by the people described above does not make you a capitalist, being one of the people described above does.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Are you able to live comfortably without working for the foreseeable future?

        I’m pretty sure that’s just a strawman version of capitalism. Plenty of capitalists who had their life’s work taken during a communist revolution and were at best told they could come back as a manager worked plenty hard. Didn’t save them.

  • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The delusional thought process is fantastic.

    You have, maybe 2k users here, defederate a new insurance a day, and users are constantly finding lack of content; but yeah it’s the normal user who is quite in the corner 🤣

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Capitalism can never work, because it’s self defeating. The point of capitalism is to maximize immediate profits, nothing else - as a result, it will gladly destroy its own means of growth if as a result instant profits increase.

  • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    For the anti-capitalists, I have a genuine question (sorry, I couldn’t find an “ask a commie” community):

    In the capitalist system there is a movement called Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) where people commit to living frugally in an effort to maximize savings and investments. The goal is to achieve a balance that allows you live off a safe withdrawal rate (around 3.5-4%) and then leave the workforce at an earlier than normal age. Some people commit to a life of minimalism and lean-FIRE with under $20k in investment income per year. I believe there is significant overlap with the van-life crowd and other nomadic lifestyles.

    Is this lifestyle compatible with, or is there a similar lifestyle within a communist system? To expand, can those with a different set of priorities trade away their later working days in exchange for less material things?

    • taanegl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      What? There are plenty of communist Lemmy subs you can ask in. I just think you haven’t tried hard enough.

      To answer your question tho, no - because there would be no need. Communism does want mandatory participation, but if checked and balanced correctly everyone would work within their limits and not be relegated to a lower class of living - because that’s sort of the point of communism. You’d work within your means until there was time to retire without being limited in access to services and goods. Theoretically, under a functioning communist system, there would be no manufactured scarcity.

      Tbh I believe both communism and our current form of capitalism centralises power and ownership way too much. Social-capitalism, or even libertarian socialism, might be the ticket. It would undo at least 200 years of psy-ops and gamed laws designed to favour the rich and vesting power in them, which is the issue of centralised power that we’re facing today - in what some call “late-stage capitalism” - or what I call the breaking point of society under a predatory, exploitative and imperialistic form of capitalism that seems more like the privatisation of the aristocracy than the supposed liberalisation of economy. Transparency, accountability and consequences for people in power and wealth is what’s sorely needed.

      PS: New public management is a con-job disguised as decentralisation meant to encumber governments under the guise of checking and balancing them, being effectively a psy-op in of itself to make people hate public services and taxes. As per usual, goddamn liberals - and I include socially conservative liberals in that polifical grouping. Dems and pubs are the same, want the same institutions and promote US imperialism - not fiscal independence, no matter what justification and mental gymnastics they put in the form of spreadsheets.

      PPS: Also, additionally, commodification of the housing market was a mistake. It will always be stupid and harmful towards society.

  • pizzahoe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    These capitalist and billionaire cocksuckers sure love socialism when they socialise their losses and fucking take our tax payer money to bail themselves out. if you’re working class and don’t support socialism, you should look into it more. Propaganda from these blood sucking billionaire ghouls have made most of us blind to the better life socialism can offer us.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      That isnt socialism, thats the capitalist state doing its job of protecting capital. Socialism is when the proletariat own the means of production.