The voting mechanism enabled “the wisdom of crowds.”
The voting mechanism enabled “the wisdom of crowds.”
But that means I have to read them all. One of the things that drew me to the other platforms was the fact that the smartest or whittiest answers came to the top.
Don’t the comments sort in order of popularity?
I think a bigger issue is the acceptance of logical falicies leading to arguments that are nothing more than insult wars.
I can think of several instances but one that comes to the top was a long well reasoned argument for FM on phones. The writer put a great deal of effort into it then ended it with “do you know how stupid you sound [for taking the other position].” I made the mistake of pointing this out and was met with downvotes and told it was a very reddit thing to say.
I would love to see a platform where fallacious arguments were excluded until resubmitted or at least flagged. They do not encourage reasoned discourse.
They don’t like the guy.
Loans that can’t be discharged are the problem. Tuition went out the roof when universities discovered this gold mine.
They have the ability to raise the standards of quality of the finished product.
You are right. It is like any generalization. I’ll go edit it.
many people making the tips don’t want tipping culture to end. They support it.
The workers don’t want to see tipping go away. They make bank in tips.
It would be really cool to enforce it via civil action. Find someone’s plate and sue them for rolling coal.
Depends on which bigotry. Generational bigotry is huge here.
This platform is full of bigots. They try to attach a group to anything to make themselves feel superior. They can’t just say selfgrandizing via ones vehicle is dumb.
Just another example of those damn participation trophies.
“food isn’t grown to feed people. Food is grown to make a profit.”
It’s so popular because it helps irresponsible profiteers.
I’m pretty sure that is still going on.
I like location based games, like Niantic has done, but with much less backstory.