According to the report, more than 30 venues launched or expanded environmental projects in cooperation with Eilish and team.

  • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    Of course not. But there’s concerts all the time in my town by local musicians and same all over the world, there’s no need for these massive tours that as you can clearly see, are bad for the environment.

    • cattywampas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 days ago

      “Why would you want to go see this artist when you can pay less to see a completely unrelated artist of a different genre with wildly different production values?”

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I see your point, however one could argue that just because we can do something doesn’t mean we should.

        For example, boats. Roughly 40% of all the oil produced goes straight into the bowels of boats that ship oil to other places. This abundance of oil allows you to experience things like being able to eat asparagus out of season.

        Does it make sense to be so inefficient? No, but we still do it because much like an alcoholic — we don’t know how else to be and people will literally die if the oil stops flowing. We’re seeing it now in real time.

        How does this connect to the music industry? Well, the ‘performance value’ you’re referring to is entirely propped up by the oil industry. Whether it’s trucks and buses to carry equipment across the country the artist plays in, or planes to carry those same people and equipment to other countries — it is all ultimately propped up by oil. Tons and tons of it, we aren’t even getting into all the plastic that ends up being sold as merch. Further still, we haven’t addressed all the oil that goes into making their equipment, buses, trucks, planes, etc. etc…

        So yeah, you can make the argument that the production value is simply superior for these big name artists. You are also tacitly expressing support for the very systems that are pushing for fascism worldwide — whether you accept reality or not.

        Like, of course I would like to see individuals like Eilish do more stuff like this. I’d also like the music industry to utterly collapse. I would much rather see the music industry collapse, actually.

        • cattywampas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Listen man I go to see local punk and jam shows but that’s not a replacement for when King Gizzard comes to town.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            And I doubt that anything I say will change your feelings on the matter. I just dislike the hypocrisy of applauding performative climate activism when it is clearly that.

            If you genuinely care about the environment and stemming the completion of the 6th known mass extinction event, you need to stop buying so much oil and oil byproducts. You should consider an internationally performing music artist tied to big record labels as an oil byproduct.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      Because all musicians sound the same so why would you want to see weird al in concert when you could see stickineye joe and his cat banjo?