airheads

In Congress, during a private session, intelligence on their spying was presented.

Like I said, Mastodon treats it much better. Collections haven’t come to Mbin yet either, so hashtags are sort of a stopgap to aggregate subs.

It’s a bummer you have to change habits to accommodate this bot…

It’s an easy habit to change. Back in the Reddit days of yore you had a pinned AutoMod comment for like every single thread.

I still struggle to believe there’s not a better way to do this exact same thing without a bot leaving comments

Well, let’s search for one then, eh?

Lemmyverse only works for Lemmy.

Check out https://kbin.melroy.org/tag/memes . On Mastodon you can even use hashtags as feeds, and that’s being implemented on Mbin as well AFAIK.

it still adds to the comment count

I don’t click if the comment count isn’t over 2.

Replies have a direct federated reference to the original post, while links take you to different instances. There are way more than 1 Mastodon and Mbin instances that want this. Just block it if you don’t wanna see it, as I for one like it.

X is Musk, which is TL;DR quite different

it doesn’t censor news with class consciousness like Meta does

Maybe? But they do manually tell the algorithm to heavily favor the elite’s videos with their “heating” tool.

Don’t they do the same things? In fact TikTok spies more stuff, but they just don’t sell it to private entities as much.

“I would rather stare at a language I can’t understand than to ever use a social media [platform] that Mark Zuckerberg owns,” said one user in a video posted to Xiaohongshu on Sunday.

then why tf did you use tiktok

Could you give an example?

Could you talk more on not trusting Wikipedia?

Yeah, and 1. Even in 2018 there was only like 25% more searches compared to the 2012 and 2025 peak of 100% more 2. TechCrunch covered #deletefacebook when that happened anyways 3. 2012 was “The Year Facebook Finally Tried to Make Some Money”. I don’t see what people mean by “not doing justice”, as TechCrunch seems to be covering how to delete Facebook when people want to delete Facebook.

Come on. The last time searches for deleting Facebook trended this much was in 2012. And even then, they posted pretty much the same thing but for just Facebook in 2022.

I’m sure on everything except smell. I was surprised too.

If a meteor falling from the sky and ruining your dessert is uplifting, then gravity doesn’t exist. Or you’re in Australia.

Commit signing is not required for any functionality, unless you opt-in to some repository setting which you have to find for yourself first.

These alternatives have vastly better UI that also layout the screen much more efficiently and have more features. I find it much easier to locate information on platforms that aren’t Forgejo/Codeberg. Sourcehut’s federation through email also just works.

this is a security thing, not a taft thing. you don’t need to sign commits to push them

plus gitlab and sourcehut are so much better

kagamine ren #1

What’s next, our cells commit usury?

I mean, it does check the power. We all know how long court cases take—especially in higher jurisdictions—and at least this means Trump can’t make some stupid unconstitutional executive decision that only gets overturned after 3 years.

Isn’t that just checking the power? If there’s no way for a power to check another power, that’s absolute chaos. And confirmation by the senate doesn’t mean the judge will listen to the senate’s every single bidding. The only thing that makes judges “beholden” to the legislature is impeachment, and that’s pretty hard. You may as well say the executive is beholden to the legislature. And it’s not like the US ever had direct presidential elections.

Judges’ lifetime appointment system on good behavior is meant to prevent them from being chosen by electioneering while still reflecting the opinions of the populace through being selected for nomination by the president. Though under Trump, they’re pretty much selected through internal election under the Federalist Society anyways.