I prefer to allow posts with controversial subjects that don’t otherwise violate any rules, such as AI generated images, because it allows for important conversations.
I would rather allow the occasional AI image be posted so that people can discuss why AI images are bad.
Arguing over doggy eugenics is off-topic on a forum about dog pictures. This was an established rule before I took over the community.
You were banned after being warned and made aware of the rule, after multiple violations and many reports from other users in the modlog.
Besides, I don’t know why you’re tu quoque-ing about this in an unrelated community, nor why you’re harassing me via DM for that matter.
Move on.
And no, AI is strictly banned in all communities I moderate. My comment above is constructive and opens a discussion, unlike your ad hominem comment here.
You told to provide facts, I did just that. After that you got all pissy and banned me with a snarky, powertripping comment you edited to remove the snark very soon after. You know pitbulls are banned in many civilized countries, right? And for a good reason: they are bred for violence. “Doggy eugenics” Jesus…
But hey, when you get to powertrip you got to powertrip even if it’s to defend a dog breed that kills and maims even unprovoked way more than any other ones, am I right?
This decision should be reconsidered and I would downvote if my instance allowed. Almost every comment is against it here.
I prefer to allow posts with controversial subjects that don’t otherwise violate any rules, such as AI generated images, because it allows for important conversations.
I would rather allow the occasional AI image be posted so that people can discuss why AI images are bad.
I’ll argue that this is a cat community, not an AI discussion community.
You’re the one who took over c/dogs? And then banned anyone putting up facts about pitbulls. I’m not surprised you’re defending AI garbage, too.
Arguing over doggy eugenics is off-topic on a forum about dog pictures. This was an established rule before I took over the community.
You were banned after being warned and made aware of the rule, after multiple violations and many reports from other users in the modlog.
Besides, I don’t know why you’re tu quoque-ing about this in an unrelated community, nor why you’re harassing me via DM for that matter.
Move on.
And no, AI is strictly banned in all communities I moderate. My comment above is constructive and opens a discussion, unlike your ad hominem comment here.
You told to provide facts, I did just that. After that you got all pissy and banned me with a snarky, powertripping comment you edited to remove the snark very soon after. You know pitbulls are banned in many civilized countries, right? And for a good reason: they are bred for violence. “Doggy eugenics” Jesus…
But hey, when you get to powertrip you got to powertrip even if it’s to defend a dog breed that kills and maims even unprovoked way more than any other ones, am I right?
There isn’t anything wrong with a comment section discussing a subject related to the post even if that subject isn’t what the community is about.
If someone posted a picture of a cat-shaped pizza then it’d be fine for that post’s commenters to discuss pizza in general.