• gurnu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You’re the one who took over c/dogs? And then banned anyone putting up facts about pitbulls. I’m not surprised you’re defending AI garbage, too.

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Arguing over doggy eugenics is off-topic on a forum about dog pictures. This was an established rule before I took over the community.

      You were banned after being warned and made aware of the rule, after multiple violations and many reports from other users in the modlog.

      Besides, I don’t know why you’re tu quoque-ing about this in an unrelated community, nor why you’re harassing me via DM for that matter.

      Move on.

      And no, AI is strictly banned in all communities I moderate. My comment above is constructive and opens a discussion, unlike your ad hominem comment here.

      • gurnu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        You told to provide facts, I did just that. After that you got all pissy and banned me with a snarky, powertripping comment you edited to remove the snark very soon after. You know pitbulls are banned in many civilized countries, right? And for a good reason: they are bred for violence. “Doggy eugenics” Jesus…

        But hey, when you get to powertrip you got to powertrip even if it’s to defend a dog breed that kills and maims even unprovoked way more than any other ones, am I right?