• leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      These patches do offer some benefits for cloud providers or in general orgs that host a bunch of different products on potentially the same machine.

      I could see benefits in them, especially if the v3 or whatever addresses some of the issues.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        then make it default off and switchable with a kernel param, or if its a lot of code then make its compilation optional and default off

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Depends: did lennart poettering write it? If so, they’ll jam it down our throats.

    • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The issue with that approach for the desktop is everyone will just move to other OS-es.

      When Microsoft does it, you live with it cuz you have no choice.

  • surfrock66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Seems like it still in development, they have improvements in mind to reduce unnecessary system calls, and at this time you would only run these patches if memory safety was ago critical you didn’t care about IO performance, which is niche.