• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    A half million in sales and over 1.5b in revenue isn’t too shabby for a device that exists as a fancy dev kit, an opportunity for the company to learn about new interaction models, and an opportunity to learn about will be compelling and differentiating for non “pro” AR / VR products.

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    I still don’t understand the point… it doesn’t have games and it came out with an underpowered M2.

    I can’t believe it still can’t play games rendered on a more powerful MacBook Pro… it can’t play any VR games? Not even beat saber? Skyrim VR? Like what’s the point lol.

    • Famko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 days ago

      It’s supposedly meant for work, not gaming from what I saw of people trying it out.

      Still doesn’t mean that it’s worth to buy it though.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      If it would be available and I had too much money and thus would use macOS, I definitely would buy one as replacement of my monitor and ego-iPad.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      20 days ago

      If any other company had a $3500 gen 1 product designed to learn about the space and market, and they made close to $2b in revenue, people would be claiming it was a wild success.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      Seems like the consensus in this community has generally been “that thing is mildly interesting, but it’s not for me. Especially not at $3.5k”

  • Paul in de Emiraten@mastodon.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 days ago

    @Alphane_Moon Apple has surprised the world with more than one invention that nobody thought was useful or that many thought already existed but in way cheaper forms.

    However, this really seems to be an invention created for someone who insisted on having his own Next Big Thing.

    • FancyPantsFIRE@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      20 days ago

      Not sure if this was snarky, but you can indeed get used ones at roughly half of retail, not a great sign for apple.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        Looking on eBay, it looks like the base models are going for around $2500, so about a $1000 off. But there are some that are priced a little lower if they’re not super pristine and or the owner wants cash now.

        • FancyPantsFIRE@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          2100 - 2500 seems to be the range, and Swappa looks to be trending cheaper than eBay. For example a “mint” 512 sold on swappa for just over 2150, it’s not quite half off, but it’s not far. And for those braving Facebook marketplace I’ve heard they are selling cheaper still… but I wouldn’t go there.

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    I feel like the 2nd part is the key takeaway they were looking for, longevity. I do feel like they could have learned this from all VR headsets, though. I don’t know anyone who purchased one and was still using it 6 months later. If they are, the % has got to be pretty small? I have no clue how you make these things last longer, but maybe apple will think of something?

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      The only reason I’m still using mine is because there is an online community that makes custom songs for beat saber. Otherwise I don’t see the point of this thing.