• HidingCat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Realised it’s not that cheap, US$500? Feels like it’s at a price point where I could spend a couple of hundred more and not get Meta involved. Made more sense when it was US$300.

    • Goronmon@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have the PSVR2 which is comparably priced but requires a PS5 console. You have the Valve Index which is $1k.

      So, it may not be “cheap” but it’s definitely cheaper than some of the alternatives.

      • HidingCat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea, but the cost of having FB acquire your data doesn’t feel so… worth it? I’m not completely privacy-focused like many on the fediverse but I do view it as a trade-off, and at US$500 the trade-off no longer feels warranted.

        Was thinking about the HP Reverb G2, it’s a little more expensive than the Quest 3, last I checked.

        • Pigeon@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Privacy isn’t normally my primary concern but with VR I find it to be a bigger deal than I usually would, particularly because the headsets can hypothetically gather data about what you’re looking at exactly (especially once eye tracking becomes more of a thing - then it’ll be exact, and that’s kinda terrifying at that point).

          And this is Meta/facebook, so. They’ll 100% do it and say they aren’t.

          • upstream@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            And they probably scan your surroundings and upload it to the cloud. Only thing creepier would be Amazon making the same thing and then sending you ads for stuff that goes with whatever they saw you had or replacements for old stuff you have.