Well they (probably) don’t go to places like this because they have any indication it’s other people. They’re (likely) incredibly anti-social in “real” life and online is hear a video game to them with no “real” people on the other side.
Deno was created by the creator of Node. When he first announced deno he stated he was going to “fix” n number of issues with node. In his presentation with the n number of issues, I think only two of them weren’t the same dumb mistakes that he had made with node (but it’s been a long time since watching so I could be remembering wrong). As far as I remember, Deno was always going to end up just as bad as node if not worse.
Like the other user said, this is clearly a problem if you allow any platform to exist. Let’s take this to an extreme extent. Say a company invents a platform that is 100% addicting, because they’ve figured out how to mind control you. Watching a single video means you will never stop using the platform and you will say whatever the creators want. Clearly that shouldn’t be allowed to exist. Things that social media sites do approximate that. They manipulate users brains into doing things that they normally wouldn’t do. This is why regulation exists. Clearly my example is farcical, but it’s meant to explain why you don’t allow just anything to exist. As a society, certain things are more dangerous than others, and we regulate those things.
Clearly this ban isn’t about that, it’s about a Chinese government doing something that the US government only wants US companies to be able to do.
Affinity is like $30.
You still need an email address…. which is functionally an account.
Complaining about needing an account to contribute is wild to me.
Or beta testing is finding them but Apple’s ridiculous feedback requirements are preventing them from being reported. Or they are getting reported and they’re being ignored because Apple is all in on the ai hype train.
The first two or three examples are really bad but the rest are quite good.
The description of the post said “complex yaml files”.
JSON is not easier for most strings. Anything multiline for example.
But yaml is a superset of JSON so you literally can use JSON and it’s still valid YAML.
They mention their company numerous times over, sure doesn’t seem like a personal blog. It seems like a company discovering something that has been documented over and over again.
I think it might be broken on mobile?
Article written like it’s someone that just discovered types even though a majority of the programming world said to use types for decades…
Also I completely disagree with the assertion that you should write everything including backend in typescript in order to share types. You should be using a schema and generating your types if you are writing large systems. That way any service that uses your APIs can generate the types as well and isn’t locked in to your language.
And please dear lord stop writing backend code in JavaScript or typescript or any scripting language.
Other than that, yes, use types. They literally do exactly what every proponent of types has said they do for years. Turns out it’s a huge benefit!
Everyone is biased, some less so. Use something like media bias checker or Ground News and read what they say the bias is and why.
I’m pretty sure that federally it’s mandated that you have to be able to mail it in.
None of the complexity of GitHub actions would be solved with any other configuration language. It needs to be a full scripting language at minimum. The problems with GHA have nothing to do with yaml.
You shouldn’t write complex yaml files. Keep it simple and yaml is great. Do complex stuff and you’ll hate your life.
I’ve had the invisible window issue, today for the first time, but not the other issues you’ve listed. iOS 18 on the other hand, holy fucking shit has it been a nightmare.
Animals are excellent at getting into things, it’s how they survive. Has nothing to do with how messy your house is. It sounds like you care and are trying to fix the situation which is all that matters.