tb_

It’s going to be based on user votes, and given just how popular that game was I don’t think it unlikely to win.

Black Myth Wukong had one of the highest concurrent player counts of Steam of all time. The game was very popular in China.

Meanwhile Astrobot’s sales figures were lacklustre, according to some reports.

I largely agree, but the interests have gotten misaligned. Back then it was the threat of regulation which changed things up, I think the governments should do a little more of that.

but… Looks like they don’t audit so good, if this article is evidence

That’s the whole issue with it being a lobby group. It makes them a ton of money, so they are incentivised against making a rating for it because that would draw more attention/limit sales.

And that’s where the whole government lobbying part comes in.

Not entirely sure about the European PEGI, but the American ESRB is funded by the same companies that it regulates. It was created after the outcry about violent games and was the industry self-regulating to avoid the government getting more involved.

It is a lobby group for the industry, for better and in this case very much for worse.

I assume PEGI is little different.

Here’s a better idea: rather than nerfing the few things causing issues, buff literally everything else. That sounds way more convenient!

The “EA Originals” that they have put out have mostly been fairly solid, Hazelight’s games especially so.

Eternals of Aveum had its fair share of flaws, but it was a complete package.

Though, because it is EA, I cannot help but wonder if/when they’ll pull the switcharoo

Usually games like Call of Duty or Grand Theft Auto are cited in these instances, but as there are no proven links between video games and real world violence, and Among Us would be a wholly new category of game here.

Is Nick still leading that channel?

I kind of lost interest after Frost made his expose

Might as well add those details to your comment.

Cynthia Williams

https://investor.funko.com/governance/management-team/person-details/default.aspx?ItemId=651cd97f-4c98-4c47-ad23-9d4b14a80178

Why not use your subscription feed?

Whatever the car in Distance is called

When a Season Pass DLC is in pre-purchase mode, you are not required to release at least one DLC in the Season Pass at the time it goes on sale (as you are usually required to do when you launch a Season Pass). However, when the game launches, you will need to release the Season Pass out of pre-purchase–this will entail releasing at least one of the DLCs included in the Season Pass.

I’m not sure I like this part specifically.

This will essentially enforce day-1 DLC. Will it be enough for that DLC to be a simple cosmetic bundle with larger expansions to follow later?
But if a simple cosmetic bundle is enough to count as the included DLC, it kinda defeats the whole point. And, in turn, it might encourage developers to include very basic DLC where they might have wanted to release a series of proper expansions.

The rest sounds great though, with partial and complete refunds for unmet promises.

With CrunchyRoll’s acquisition Sony basically monopolized anime streaming in the west. This would only add to that

Disappointing sales, I guess, but a single player/co-op game doesn’t need the same playerbase as a hero shooter

Given the context of the video, I think they’re pretty funny.

I quite liked Stephanie’s video about Veilguard’s forced “guyversity” and “himclusion”.

There are alternatives to Fandom which aren’t Wikipedia: https://getindie.wiki/

In case you happen to be unaware, that’s EAC’s logo.

If it was just a joke, imagine I didn’t say anything.

Can’t you hide games?