The point of blockchains is decentralization, and as Lemmy users we know that decentralized services are difficult to make popular, even if they’re an improvement over their competitors.

There are now Bitcoin Ordinals, which are similar to NFTs but with a sufficient size limit to actually store the media itself.

Why is it impossible? The simplest possible way would be to hold new elections in Gaza for which Hamas do not run.

It would probably lead to a group identical to Hamas being elected, but it would be neither Israel nor Hamas.

What may be impossible is a government that’s aligned with western governments, but that’s not what is being asked for.

How about a fully state-controlled economy?

Not capitalism, since there’s no private capital; not communism, since there’s a state.

Literally everyone relates to this.

If you believe something as common as this is sufficient to diagnose a mental disorder, you might’ve been misdiagnosed (or your diagnosis was explained insufficiently).

I do have an idea how “a difficult to kill, unwanted growth” could be put into relation to a war fueled by hatred.

None of them have to.

Was soll “nichts offiziell anerkanntes” heißen? Taiwan in sich ist “nichts offiziell anerkanntes” (in Deutschland).

If you are trying to imply that potatoes and vegan meat aren’t awesome food you are factually wrong.

Yeah I’m not saying hCaptcha is good. It just shows that new captcha systems can become popular, and that Google’s hold isn’t as strong as it may seem.

Private Lock also hasn’t been updated for four years :(

hCaptcha is catching on pretty quickly.

Does it say that both the front end and back end are proprietary, or just the back end? I’d be fine with a closed source back end

No third-party services

Support for alternative routing

(following link)

alternative routing requires us to use third-party infrastructure and networks we do not control

huh

Your Nana when she was young:

Wieso ist es relevant, ob der Artikel von einer KI verfasst wurde, wenn es (bis zum Ende) gar nicht auffällt?

Humans eradicated species of animals long before even the medieval ages.

It’s just a thing humans do.

I do think it’s desirable. It’s unnecessary for users to keep track of which tool is best for which purpose if one tool can do it all. There’s no reason why one tool wouldn’t be able to; even in the worst case it could just automatically choose the best tool to answer your prompt, saving you the trouble of doing so.

A single tool isn’t going to meet all those needs yet

I don’t know what your definition of “chasing” is, but whatever it may be it seems to be independent of the group that’s being “chased”.

So in that case you could say “chasing” is bad while a preference is not, completely regardless of whether you’re talking about trans people, disabled people or any other group.