Yeah, it would be a good idea. Not to auto-update functions, because that would be very very bad, but to at least indicate there’s an update available.
Yeah, it would be a good idea. Not to auto-update functions, because that would be very very bad, but to at least indicate there’s an update available.
For stuff like that, it’s best to have an auto formatter like checkstyle or something.
Had a team lead that kept requesting nitpicky changes, going in a FULL CIRCLE about what we should change or not, to the point that changes would take weeks to get merged. Then he had the gall to say that changes were taking too long to be merged and that we couldn’t just leave code lying around in PRs.
Jesus fucking Christ.
There’s a reason that team imploded…
LLMs are statistical word association machines. Or tokens more accurately. So if you tell it to not make mistakes, it’ll likely weight the output towards having validation, checks, etc. It might still produce silly output saying no mistakes were made despite having bugs or logic errors. But LLMs are just a tool! So use them for what they’re good at and can actually do, not what they themselves claim they can do lol.
Seems to be the only necessary thing in my case! Thanks.
Yeah I definitely have the default GTK chooser. Guess I have some config playing to do later.
Can you explain a bit more about this and how to configure it? When I use FF on gnome, the save dialogue just looks like other dialogues?
Not necessarily. While of course in many many cases, open source is a volunteer effort, there’s usually some implicit transaction going on. Whether that’s improving the software for yourself and passing that on to others, being a business and improving a library or something you use that helps your project generate revenue, or even a straight up commercial transaction.
But in all these cases, the open source project can be taken by you (or others) and you can do whatever you want with it. In the case of Winamp here, you cannot do any of that. It would be different if they were paying for contributions. But they’re not, so.
They basically want free labor.
You can right click the URL bar for sites that support the OpenSearch XML standard. Which I guess is what they wanted to replace it with. But I don’t really know why they removed the button to a about: config setting. Could at least be a checkbox or something to enable.
Returns the add custom search engine button. Which for some reason, has been hidden by default.
I find it somewhat unclear how this works. Is it the JavaScript that loads comments on the posts, on the static site itself?
Right. I agree.
You mean the part about people citing laws like GDPR is dead on?
Definitely a good way to do it. Photoprism supports uploading to WebDAV for sharing. Could front a CDN upload with a web dav server 🤔
Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. I am using photoprism for photo management. It doesn’t really support S3 or any CDN. You could use a fuse filesystem or something, but it’s very slow.
Where are you uploading galleries? Just your own HDD connected to a static website?
Word can in fact open odt files. It was added quite a long time ago. Don’t know how good the compatibility is, though
The fork was originally created because upstream NewPipe elected not to include sponsor block functionality.
Seems like something got messed up when copy and pasting. It’s fixed now.
Thanks for catching it!