I thought it was representing an unplanned “quick sync”.
I thought it was representing an unplanned “quick sync”.
Who’s the company involved in this? I’m not in the US so I’ve probably missed a lot of context here.
Except he’s not a woman or dark skinned, which is what the poster is looking for.
Are you nuts? Women take a massive hit to their careers just for having the potential to take time to have babies.
Let’s make a different assumption. Let’s assume equal rates of desire for taking time to be with family among men and women. You would then see equal rates of employment between men and women. This map shows that’s not true and so if my assumption is true then there’s a problem for both genders.
This is the difference, not the employment rate. So maybe they’re more equally unemployed. Maybe men have a higher unemployment rate generally there, bringing them down to meet the women’s rate.
You can’t smell a photo.