They certainly are in that less logical camp, that’s for sure. And you’re right, they have not and will not learn anything from this instance, or similar ones, going forward.
They certainly are in that less logical camp, that’s for sure. And you’re right, they have not and will not learn anything from this instance, or similar ones, going forward.
Got my ban overturned :)
For the troll in here, idk your name I blocked you, the guy “very fluent” in these matters - take this opportunity to humble and educate yourself
I can’t tell you why, you are entirely correct. The EAC runtime used in Linux doesn’t have any kernel access, I misunderstood the context of the conversation when I made my first comment.
Lmao you can’t be real. Ignorance is bliss, I suppose.
I might take you up on that, thanks for the offer!
Got any recommended sources for someone looking to do the same thing? My home server is approaching 18 years old, was looking to set up something neat and tidy to replace it when it eventually fails. Tricking a windows vm sounds pretty useful too!
How exactly does one prove a negative? Juggling fallacies isn’t a good look, my friend.
Are you aware that EAC is indeed a kernel level anticheat? Apex 100% does not use a user space anticheat, it is kernel level.
You’re the goat! Thanks for sharing. I dropped a comment to the respawn employee and a comment on the EA thread linked in the reddit post.
Same thing happened to me, unfortunate for us…
I mean she did tell you to kick rocks, in so many words. No one wants to be friends with or even interact with someone they consider to be a stalker, let alone their stalker. She called you a stalker which implies she doesn’t want to be around you without saying so, many times people will avoid being so blunt about stuff like that for fear of retaliation. She was hoping you’d pick up on the hint that she doesn’t want to be friends without having to confront you about it directly.
I’m not passing any judgement, I think you were right it was a bit of a miscommunication on both ends; she wasn’t entirely clear and you missed the implications of her message.
Another neat trick: X% of Y is equal to Y% of X. That is, in your example, 27% of 65 == 65% of 27. So check and see which combination might provide fewer steps/messy numbers.
13.5 (50% of 27) + 2.7 (10% of 27) + 1.35 (5% of 27) = 17.55
Wouldn’t you like to know, robo-boy
deleted by creator
I really appreciate that, it does sound like a lot of fun!
Any chance you might be able to give some highlights of what you consider significant differences between 5e and PF1/2 (your choice)? My only experience is 5e tabletop and BG3.
This comment feels like it just stepped out of a time machine. I can’t remember the last time I fretted over 200MB of overhead/memory usage.
I’m in no way judging you, merely commenting on how different our use cases and expectations are.
Let’s see if they get it this time! (Hint: they won’t)
Nothing’s stopping you from weapon swapping! I did exactly that on a homebrew bow build beginning of this league. Was kind of a bitch to craft essentially 2 of the same bow, but it worked well enough to take down uber bosses
I never got to experience Dominus being the big bad, but I’ve heard they were good time indeed
I was waiting for the /s the whole time, that comment read like a joke but I think it was actually sincere…