“to the right of grandpa” so his right

edit: (i think)

the species thing isn’t exactly what you said. there are 3 things that can happen that i remember:

1: most cross-species breeding results in nothing.

2: some, like horses and donkeys, or tigers and lions, results in babies that will grow up normally except that they can’t breed themselves.

3: and rarely, like in grizzlies and polar bears, the result is a baby that will grow up perfectly and still be fertile

interbreeding in DnD would be the 3rd option.

i’m gonna put this on my next campaign

i saw the same thing but more jpegged right above this one

i dont think it should’ve been in a community for dad jokes tho

oh ok so its basically the same thing

in pf2e you also specify what’ll trigger the action, but the explanation for how the action works is way shorter

Ready [two-actions]
traits: Concentrate
Source Player Core pg. 417

You prepare to use an action that will occur outside your turn. Choose a single action or free action you can use, and designate a trigger. Your turn then ends. If the trigger you designated occurs before the start of your next turn, you can use the chosen action as a reaction (provided you still meet the requirements to use it). You can’t Ready a free action that already has a trigger.

If you have a multiple attack penalty and your readied action is an attack action, your readied attack takes the multiple attack penalty you had at the time you used Ready. This is one of the few times the multiple attack penalty applies when it’s not your turn.

source: archives of nethys (yes every pathfinder rule is in a free to use website)

well in pathfinder 2e you can turn 1 action into a reaction, which is basically the same thing

anyway how does readying actions work in d&d?

haha jokes on you, in pathfinder we can delay our turn

pathfinder also only goes up to 20 levels and it has so much customization possibilities i bet there are people who dont play it because there are too many options

and the more levels a game has, the less thought goes into each one, so more levels i think would mean less customizability more often than not

from what i understood, the dm asked to know if the spell would have effect, not if the creature was going to use it or not

i came here to say the same thing

the monkey is just like “🟡”

edit: dammit every time i try using an emoji it loses its face

i had a chaotic neutral player once that was trying to convince a lawful evil player that it was wrong to kill a goblin when they both work for some guys who were telling them to kill goblins

LE player remembered CN of his alignment and he intantly killed the goblin

so if i understood that correctly… basically if you dont multiclass you’ll be worse than others of the same class

does mean its never a good choice to play stricly as one class? or at least that there are classes that gain more than they lose from going off course?

is bardlock a mix of bard and warlock?

why is everything a warlock in dnd?

that surely is… a meme template

thankfully i have no idea how to make a good atmosphere in a game so that’s never a problem

the gm would know about the guy trying to do that so i think it’d be perfectly fine (and very funny)

at the end of the game, the wizard or the mucus child should be able to take the sword out of the stone

it would be even funnier if it’s a fighter with the barbarian archetype (pf2e) or 1 level of fighter and the rest of barbarian (dnd) so that their lore is someone who was trained to use a sword but couldnt, so started raging and getting stronger to use that hammer

uhhh you can see there are gaps between some faces and there arent on others, so it really isnt well balanced

edit: i somehow typed f`ces