Probably yeah. A fireproof safe will be airtight, so the system can only produce as much energy as whatever reagents you put inside.
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Where is “nothing is real, but good luck making use of that information”?
disorderly@lemmy.worldto
Games@lemmy.world•Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlashEnglish
1·12 days agoYep, you and I are operating in orthogonal spaces. I genuinely envy you.
disorderly@lemmy.worldto
Games@lemmy.world•Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlashEnglish
2·13 days agoHaha, yeah I use it as well, and like I said it makes drafting the code a lot faster, but it dramatically slows down review and validation of fit for the business purpose.
If I could, I’d put the genie back in the bottle because having ICs dump thousand line MRs on each other and then finding out in gamma that it didn’t actually solve the problem is a ton worse than making a person actually think about what they’re gonna commit for a couple hours. But alas, if we don’t take a first draft with Claude or Gemini agentic tools for every ticket we’ll get PIP’d, so I guess the AI enthusiasts and their sponsors are happy.
disorderly@lemmy.worldto
Games@lemmy.world•Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlashEnglish
31·13 days agoI think that newer models of Claude are a lot better, but they are still just chatbots and they still just generate words. As anyone in the industry will tell you: typing out the code was never the slow part.


I assume you mean radio frequencies, and the answer is basically none. A grounded fireproof safe is basically a perfect faraday cage.
EDIT: Ok, I actually have a pedantic answer for this. If you put a microphone on a device inside the safe, you can signal it from outside by sending it vibrations, and you could encode a message in binary and thus technically send it a “digital signal”. If you wanted to be a little more analog you could use Morse code :)