Plutus, Haskell, Nix, Purescript, Swift/Kotlin. laser-focused on FP: formality, purity, and totality; repulsed by pragmatic, unsafe, “move fast and break things” approaches

AC24 1DE5 AE92 3B37 E584 02BA AAF9 795E 393B 4DA0

  • 9 Posts
  • 292 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 17th, 2023
  • demesisx@infosec.pubtoTechnology@beehaw.org•China is building a cyber army of hackers, report findsEnglish
    7·
    2 months ago

    You conveniently dodged my question, then asked me stupid questions, thinking I’d have to agree with cherry-picked offenses by China. I am not a fan of China. I just think they are justified in defending themselves. Furthermore, I think it’s hilarious that the the US decided to offshore our high tech goods to have them manufactured there as if we weren’t ASKING to be hacked. The only solution going forward is CLEARLY domestic RISC-V manufacturing and not allowing our enemies to manufacture our critical technologies.

    Do I support China’s:

    • domestic surveillance: of course not
    • transnational repression: of course not
    • supression (sp!) of free speech and freedom of the press: of course not
    • bullying of its neighbours: of course not
    • aggression against Taiwan: of course not

    Do I support China engaging in pre-emptive cyber warfare against aggressors: absolutely

    Do I support the US engaging in pre-emptive cyber warfare against aggressors: absolutely

    Do I support Israel engaging in pre-emptive cyber warfare against aggressors: absolutely

    Do I support war crimes being committed by ANY of these countries: NO

  • demesisx@infosec.pubtoTechnology@beehaw.org•China is building a cyber army of hackers, report findsEnglish
    7·
    2 months ago

    Embedding Trojans in your enemy’s infrastructure and leaving them to be switched on in times of war is ABSOLUTELY defense. You may not like it. But that’s called cyber warfare.

    Quick question: Do you fundamentally disagree with what China is accused of but fully support Israel and the US’s extrajudicial backdoors, Trojan horses, domestic spying, pager bomb assasinations, AI targeted air strikes, and other clandestine war crimes just because they are perpetrated by “the good guys”?

  • demesisx@infosec.pubBanned from communitytoNo Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•A monolithic and ruthless conspiracy: What was John F. Kennedy referring to?English
    159·
    5 months ago

    It’s pretty funny to see this thread filled with wrong answers by lemmy.world users and those same smuglibs downvoting anyone that suggests otherwise when it’s pretty universally accepted that he was killed by the CIA.

    The CIA even did a distinctive CIA-style cleanup job , eliminating all parties with knowledge of the hit afterward.

    What for many years seemed unthinkable has turned out to be true after all.

    There was a CIA cover-up. The CIA did suppress information. The CIA did stonewall both of the official government investigations of the JFK assassination. And as a consequence of this Agency misconduct, both investigations were compromised in important respects-particularly in regard to the fundamental issues of whether the assassination resulted from a conspiracy and whether Lee Harvey Oswald (alleged to be the sole assassin in the Warren Report and alleged to be one of multiple assassins in the Report of the House Assassinations Committee) was affiliated with the CIA.