• 0 Posts
  • 346 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • bouh@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlIt's Women's Fault
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    If you deny that this meme is disdainful of the “there is a loneliness epidemic” statement, then you’re in bad faith.

    Even if what you’re saying is logically true, that’s not the truth people see, as this thread demonstrates. Which means you’re in bad faith here.


  • If you had any education in logic, A => B => C means something.

    When you do this logical development, it means C is the consequence of A.

    The même format also implies that C is a stupid assertion, because it’s associated with the clown figure. It says that the existence of a loneliness epidemic is a stupid proposition.

    This is denying reality. And this is mocking the people who suffer from loneliness.

    The biggest problem is not even the link between incels and loneliness epidemic. It is the denial of the problem. This is litteraly akin to conspiracy theories.



  • bouh@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlIt's Women's Fault
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    Except it makes the link with loneliness, which has nothing to do with incels. By doing so, this kind of post litteraly says that alllonely men are like the worst incels.

    It is insulting. And it is directly feeding the narrative of the fascists that says that feminists are mere anti-men instead of pro-equality.

    This même is a blend of arrogance, ignorance, disdain and malice. Even the fascist are rarely doing so bad.










  • bouh@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlFuck Tankies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    27 days ago

    But no one supports the authoritarian USSR except idiots. So why is there propaganda against it?

    It’s litteraly like doing propaganda against the French Empire of Napoléon. That stuff is dead and even the biggest moron are not stuck to it anymore.

    I’m talking about the west obviously, where litteral nazi are parading in the streets and developing their networks irl and on social médias, and those libtards are doing absolutely nothing about it.



  • We do have a problem of polarisation. But on the other hand we also have a problem of too many games, so we simply can’t play them all. This leads us to a need to choose which one to pick. And a bad choice is very bad, because games are expensive and time consuming.

    Now the real problem is when a community mistaken a new game for another. Like avowed was considered a terrible game because the leader scroll fanboys thought it would be their next game, and it wasn’t. Anyone who know what old school bioware games were will certainly love avowed.

    Now while veilgard is not a bad game, is it actually good? I’m not informed enough yet about it, but bioware has been terrible in the last decade, so I am clearly very wary of what they’re doing.

    I will wait for a discount for both those games, and I’ll play avowed first because I’m informed and careful, and I have other games to play already.

    On the side there’s also the problem of fascist propaganda that will brand a game woke a try to destroy it.


  • I am not sure it would be any good. Basically it would mean the meta spells would be counterable like before, so the characters have an option to take less useful or more niche spells to avoid a counterspell.

    But in practice counterspell is already constrained by memory slots, spellslots and actions (it takes a bonus action, which there is only one per turn), and also range and vision. It also takes identifying the spell to not waste your counterspell on something useless.

    So I’m not sure what the intent could be with this. A wizard would basically be required to take fireball if only to counter it, and avoid using it against another wizard. It feels to me that it would decrease the possibilities, not increase them.



  • bouh@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlI'm a leftist
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    While this is somewhat true, in all of the west there are only 3 groups currently : liberals, fascists and leftists.

    Liberals are a diverse group, ranging from socio-democrat and liberal green parties to libertarian who leans on fascism.

    Fascists are all the brands of conservatives who leverage racism, authoritarianism and nationalism.

    Leftists are basically the groups opposed to both fascism and liberalism.

    Those are 3 objective groups. They are the groups that determine how likely they will cooperate or oppose each other, or how elections will turn.

    Some parties will be a bit in between, but that’s merely political communication. In practice a group that promote itself as a middle group is actually leaning right. This means that “leftist liberals” (who range from some green parties and movements to the socio-democrats) will always pick liberals if they must choose between them and the left. Likewise, conservatives and libertariens are leaning toward fascism when given the choice.

    The political spectrum is radicalised and triparted. You can deny this model and blur the information, but it usually means that you are leaning more to the right than you are pretending.



  • bouh@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlCure for Fascism
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not my fault if liberals are blind to fascism since forever, and fighting the left instead. Like a fucking nazi is in the US government but liberals are still doing propaganda about tiananmen. They’re collaborators if you ask me.