I’ve never heard of Pokémon Leggenos.

What’s a “home muffin”?

Let’s go further. Let’s have worker-owned everything.

Worker-owned factories, stores, restaurants, etc. Worker-owned government!

Let’s cut out the people that do not work but take 90% of the revenue.

Just because CO announced, a few days early, that they were releasing an unoptimized mess, shouldn’t people complain about it being an unoptimized mess?

We should never think it’s okay for companies to release underdeveloped, unfinished games.

I don’t think anyone would overlook one of the most mentioned features everywhere for the past three months.

They’re the ones that make the games!

If it was me talking about Pikachu games, I could talk about chance. But them? They decide if there will be a new game or not.

Making games is always complicated. If you “release and forget” people complain. If you keep supporting a game for a decade people complain.

To be honest, I’d prefer for them to keep expanding a game I like. That’s what kept me playing SC1 for the past 65 years (or however long it has been since the game has been released).

My experience is the opposite. While there were bad DLCs, most of them were awesome.

But in this case it seems the money goes to Israel, so it’s the equivalent of a box collecting money to KILL children.*

*only children of the “wrong” skin color and religion, obviously.

He needs a contract to make money. Putting his episodes on YouTube without being paid to do it would benefit Google.

The message he’s sending is: “if you want my show, pay me”.

The $250 he would earn with Adsense on YouTube is irrelevant.

If playing a game is fun I’ll have fun. If playing it is not fun, I’ll not have fun.

I don’t take grading systems in consideration. Just like the color of the protagonist’s shirt doesn’t affect my fun.

• interactive widgets
• widgets on the desktop
• option to disable mouse acceleration (finally!!)
• support for hearing aids (I’ve been waiting for this one for years)
• can now change text size per app
• other apps can access passwords, so you can finally use your Safari passwords on chrome

And these are only the OS changes that I care about. I’m sure there are more.

I’ve never seen any social commentary content from them. I haven’t watched everything they do, but can’t be that common if I haven’t seen it yet.

So our options should be to accept a company that prevents us from using 100% of OUR phones, or choosing the crappy competitor?

That’s a lose-lose scenario. Why would anyone defend it?

They’re illegal in the country I live in. I mostly meant they should be illegal basically everywhere.

Great news!

You’re thinking of technically taking the decisions in the company. But shareholders can do much more. Like influencing the value of stocks by selling too many at once.

All of that has been predicted by Marx since the 19th century. And he already created a better system.

It’s called knowledge, and it’s not fair to prevent people from using their knowledge.

Apple already have their patents. That’s what patents are for! The startup can’t do exactly what Apple did, or they would be sued. The startup will have to use their knowledge to create NEW tech, and that’s an excellent result.