Are Americans intrinsically wrong about Everything? Like, I get most things, but surely one of us has had a correct thought before
Are Americans intrinsically wrong about Everything? Like, I get most things, but surely one of us has had a correct thought before
“But I am growing up. And besides, I have no other way of talking, I’m sorry, I’m still learning. But thank you for the advice!”
Try this.
They can, once the two meet. But the women are often in situations where nine other men have seemed to be doing that, then got creepy. So for their safety they don’t engage.
oh to be clear. I know the democrats are doing terrible things, I just think it’s easier and more practical to get them to stop than it is to keep them out of office.
While it sometimes feels like this, it’s because the vocal minorities on the side not associated with the current president are always the loudest political figures.
For a single-issue anti-genocide voter, the US is a duopoly of bad choices. For most anyone else, absolutely correct.
In conclusion, there are two terrorist groups fighting, and the civilians of both groups are suffering for it.
Not voting blue is voting red in the current system. So how do I not vote for a nazi party?
Genocide is a necessary but not sufficient condition for nazism.
Every vote or lack thereof is a vote for genocide. There isn’t really a way to vote against it.
I’d rather vote for the party that’s 85% nazi than 100%. And in a world where it’s entirely unrealistic that anyone else can win between past-the-post voting and voter disenfranchisement, that’s the best we’re getting.
One clear and dry example of this that comes to mind is that Code Bullet got banned from JStris(or some other online tetris server?) because he was botting and not in their dedicated bot queue
Yes, because that’s exactly what the thread is about. Making assumptions about control flow.
Since Jimmy Carter, I’d imagine
I work with two guys named Hunter and they’re very cool
wii homebrew developer maybe?
It could also be, perhaps, someone’s given name before adoption gave them a new one. Or perhaps a meddling relative suggested a “better” name, and then the person went back to the one they were born with, leaving the relative’s name idea dead.
It’s not trans-exclusive (I fall into the latter category I mentioned) but it’s definitely a mostly trans concept
I get it but only because of balatro
This seems like, a really weird thing for the US Government to lie about.