It’s a strawman because I never said that linux is a boomer meme but that the meme format is boomer

If you spend your time on youtube shorts or trending sure it’s thrash. But I mainly watch math and science contents which is sometimes better than real courses and there is an uncountable quantity of knowledge on there

I guess you don’t visit youtube then. Because its comments are mainly memes (like 95% of it), reference to some funny moments in the video or additional info related to it

No reason to strawman. And anyway yes linux is not that recent.

Facebook is full of this thrash and it’s one of the reasons I avoid it. Lemmy has its own content which is better

Doesn’t change the fact it’s a soulless boomer meme

Also not YouTube-like at all

Please keep Facebook-like memes on Facebook

Would have included Invoke, SDNext and ComfyUI in the AI generators. Most people won’t use a raw model

My question was how does Ecosia make money?

Interesting, I paid the same for my phone. But I will keep it five years so it will be a less cheap pixel then

<3

Unfortunately pixel phones are too expensive for a phone. I went with a Galaxy A34 which is good, but no graphene os for me

The state knows

All I want is Microsoft Exchange support (I didn’t choose to need it…)

How do they get money? Do they use my data ? Or do they put sponsored links? I don’t want either

I will look into it

Sound volume mixer

You can fork signal’s protocol

Hopefully one day they’ll all use Signal

Sure you can always infinitely define what is behind but I don’t think it is relevant here or you couldn’t do any moral logic.

The two axioms I assumed are A1 a proven fact and A2 the very defintion of having something to hide. It is enough for this specific problem.

I don’t see how Gödel’s theorems are useful since they say that a given system of actions is either incomplete or inconsistent. With these two axioms it’s hardly inconsistent and we don’t care about it being incomplete since we only have one theorem to prove

You’re welcome :) to be honest it’s my first for this as well 😂, but I do have experience with math.

The one thing that ticked me with your proof, was about your phrasing. You were trying to prove !(p=>q) i.e. p^!q by a counter example, but your wrote “suppose we have p^!q”, which is already the thesis of the proof. So what you wrote is essentially “We will proof A is false. Suppose !A, then !A.” which is not proving !A. What you should have done is to remove the “suppose” part and say if p=>q then if I nothing to hide I should not be concerned, but I can have nothing to hide and be concerned, which is a contradiction. Then your proof would be somewhat correct but my last two arguments still hold. The issue could be solved woth some modals or quantifiers to express the different people.