because putins precondition for peacetalks is ukranian withdrawal from the donbass, which translates to any progress made by the ukranians since 2022.
because putins precondition for peacetalks is ukranian withdrawal from the donbass, which translates to any progress made by the ukranians since 2022.
Anakin also subscribes to that idea, given how well he treats R2D2 and C3PO
Can’t wait for dumb investors to get bailed out again can’t have the engines of finance halt woo woo lets go.
why are you defining imperialism as the export of capital and not, idk, the use of force against other nations?
aren’t marxist-leninists supposed to be against all empire?
Under the asumption I am most people, can you give me the definition of socialism you prefer?
and are the enlightened centrists in the room with us now?
Would you like to place bets on the chance of there being a 2028 election? I won’t even ask for 1:100000 odds, I’ll happily accept 1:100
I downvoted, not due to any disagreement towards the politics, but just because the memecraft on display here is abyssmal.
Software costs nothing to copy and paste, only to design.
The term “whale” just implies a big spender, it doesn’t exlude gambling addicts, dumb children or the fiscally irresponsable.
Company proceeds to be purchased by microsoft
The news of KSP 2’s death has got me playing KSP [1] for the first time in years. It’s still abyssmally optimised, but nonetheless fun as ever!
Ok, but you can’t actually isolate ‘knowledge of addictive behaviour’ into a regulatable thing without an absurd amount of government oversight i.e. examing every employees work to check they aren’t using that pesky psyschology degree.
Ok, but what would be the legal precendent there? We regulate tabacco precisely because of it’s psychological and medical effects, not because it’s bad for your wallet. This lawsuit depends upon a claim of addiction because you can’t just regulate something for annoying you.
Migrating to the EU is not no, but due process is. Having items seized (in the way the article also describes) would qualify as an abuse of power.
It’s eye witness testimony (according to article) so technically good journalistic practice to quote rather than state. Elsewhere it talks about beatings, for which the journalists could see the wounds, so no quotations are used. If the i had evidence of gunshots (I.e. footage, bullet wounds) I suspect they would state rather than quote.
I get that it seems awfully calous to cast doubt on the words of the vulnerable, but the fact remains there are those who mask lies behind a veneer of vulnerablility, it’s best practice for a reason.
it’s that zelensky is being posed in the meme as the main obstacle to peace, rather than the invading russian army.