Can you elaborate?

Now, because this article got a little long, as per a friend’s suggestion, here’s a table of contents:

Optimization gives us optimal programs

Branch weights and the CPU’s branch predictor

-O3 produces much faster code than -O2

Javascript interpreters JIT at runtime because they don’t know which paths are hot ahead of time

If you have a compiler, you don’t need an interpreter

The middle-end is target/platform-independent

The compiler optimizes for data locality

-O0 gives you fast compilation

Templates are slow to compile

Separate compilation is always worth it

Why does link-time optimization (LTO) happen at link-time?

Inlining is useful primarily because it eliminates a call instruction

The role of the inline keyword

The best production compiler to study is LLVM

Undefined behavior only enables optimizations

The compiler can “simply” define undefined behavior 99% correctness rate is ok

You might want to look at obtainium as a package source as well

I really like Stellarium on Android

She may be a narcissist, and you might benefit from looking for r/raisedbynarcissists or the equivalent Lemmy community.

Not exactly universal but there is wide compatibility. If it looks the same then you are probably ok, but you need the right type.

Godot is incredible

LOL

She and Biden had four years to demonstrate policies that help the working class. They did so little that the working class supported trump.

That’s the concession: the built in support for corporate agendas, since that’s where Democratic money comes from. You don’t need to put it in your platform when it’s obvious from your actions that “the economy”, to you, means the board room.

I understood him to mean that Democrats were more interested in appealing to Liz Cheney as Republican lite, rather than advocating vigorously for the working class. They take money from corporate interests, and then pretend they don’t protect them. They didn’t do enough to address the problem of inflation, and American workers were angry.

This is anti engagement:

“the year was, 1984… we know you came to learn about a computer, but we’re going to spend five minutes telling you what commercials were on TV at the time, what songs were popular, and what movies were out”

What does the over under refer to in the design?

Oh my God. That’s awful.

Thanks for posting about jet brains coopting and closing the rust plug-in. Yuck!

Somebody I care about has had an incredible event or experience in their life. Of course I care and want to hear about it.

fuck saint Peter

You believe in a very progressive God

That’s a reddit thing.

There are no poop knives in the fediverse

Just like how you had to know to Radio->Ideology in Civilization V, or that Great Scientists, Engineers, and Merchants are pooled together and so Merchants harm your science and production

Wait what!? Great people are pooled together!? No wonder I suck at civilization!

ETA: link for anyone like me who didn’t know the details

https://www.reddit.com/r/civ5/comments/8wjq2r/comment/e1wious/

The groin strike rule was repealed for a time. BJJ still dominated.

I’m not a martial arts person. I couldn’t care less. But it’s weird how vigorously people will argue against what seems self evident in the closest things we have to a no holds barred setting.

They didn’t have many at the beginning. Which rule during the rise of BJJ do you think affected it being dominant?

If you want to know what world, look at MMA.

Brazilian jiu jitsu is basically the only credible form of what most people mean when they say “martial arts” (meaning Asian origin with some kind of progression, often with belts).

China is so salty that karate can’t survive the age of the Internet they are blackballing it’s critics.

Search for “bullshido” if you want some egregious examples