The output of a model isn’t speech protected by the 1st amendment, so this lawsuit is dumb. It’ll of course waste time and money though.

Wtf?

(Clojure is (parentheses (diluted with (Java))).)

While I can’t speak to the amount itself (somehow the industry as a whole settled on 30%), I do think it’s fair to say that Steam, the App Store, and the Play Store aren’t just payment processors. They also are platforms for users to discover new software/games, and they do a lot of advertising for developers. I can agree with the fee being too high, but I don’t think it’s fair to compare it with PayPal, which only processes the payments.

She’s literally just doing her own version of the MrBeast face. It’s not even that unique. Half the people I watch on YouTube slap their face in their thumbnail, and I don’t watch clickbaity slop.

Just install DeArrow, enable thumbnails through it if needed, and move on.

For roughly the price of a single 9800x3d*, you can buy a complete laptop with a long lasting battery and decent enough specs for web browsing, video playback, and basic office work. It’s unfortunately one of the better devices on the market at that price, especially accounting for the battery life.

*Edit: okay the processors came down in price. Fine, the cost of a kit of decent DDR5 memory, then.

Apple selling a ‘repairable’ and low-end device just looks like a recession indicator to me.

One of the few, I take it?

The lawsuit says Apple did more than just link to content. It claims Apple got around YouTube’s protections to download and use videos directly. The creators argue this breaks the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which bans getting past systems meant to protect copyrighted material.

Nah they can lose that lawsuit fuck that. Not about to see DMCA section 1201 used to block everyone from using a YouTube video ever in any other content.

A quick search might answer your question, but at its core, it treats people as the vulnerability rather than anything software related.

People talk about security here occasionally, though there are places to discuss it. Also, bugs are the most common source of vulnerabilities (though social engineering is a much more common type of attack), so the response seems reasonable to me.

Regarding hacking, for white hat I believe there are communities, though I’d imagine there’s overlap with cybersecurity communities. I don’t know of, nor would I recommend, anything black hat.

Agreed. Not only are harassment and abuse not new, but using actual hacking tools to do it is old news too. Maybe the article is just trying to bring it back to attention.

how do you fit guitar practice into a dev schedule?

working as a web dev, 8+ hours at a keyboard. by evening my hands are tired and i just want to zone out.

been trying to do 20 min before work instead. it’s not much but it’s consistent. any other devs who play — how do you manage it?

My point was more along the lines of online being impractical. Sure, you can still connect to servers running old software (in which case kernel updates aren’t useful to you anyway), but anything with modern security or software is going to just not run at all on it, whether because the software is too heavy for the processor or because it simply was not compiled for it (and cannot be).

Point is, I think we both agree that the only reasonable usecase for these processors is offline or on a separate network (LAN/tunneled/etc).

What kind of security risk are you at running a 486? You can barely handle the TLS handshake. Modern malware would just brick your system the same way any other modern software would.

If money is speech, then taxes clearly violate the first amendment. In fact, any kind of payment does.

Therefore, I should not have to pay taxes either. It’s not like the rich do, anyway.

The only bet I see here is on large-scale financial decline. If they expected to see any kind of major productivity boosts in the future, they’d be hiring everyone they can.

If he were remotely believable, I’d be skeptically supportive. He’s full of shit though, as he’s always been.

“So in a single building, we can create a lithography mask, make the chip, test the chip, make another mask, and have an incredibly fast recursive loop for improving the chip design.”

He does know how long it takes to make a single wafer at scale, right? Well actually, I guess he doesn’t. GamersNexus has a good fab tour on YouTube that goes over the process and explains just how long it takes for the full production chain, from start to finish. It’s not a very fast process.

The job losses are AI-driven, though. The upper management fucked around with pouring billions into AI and found out, and the people who had nothing to do with that decision get to pay for it.

No, it wont. I wasn’t suggesting someone should use rustc directly. You’re already using Rust, so using cargo isn’t adding to the supply chain.

That being said, there was one time I needed to use rustc directly. We had an assignment that needed to be compilable from a single source file. I couldn’t bundle a Cargo.toml, so I gave a build script that used rustc directly.

I don’t see why not. Cargo is fundamentally just a fancy wrapper around rustc, anyway. Sure, it’s a really fancy wrapper that does a lot of stuff but it’s entirely possible to just call rustc yourself.

You can run rustc directly! You just need to pass about 30 different parameters to it as well as a list of all the dependencies you use and…

Look, it works for small projects.