Not sure about that one but the following one:

In each language, the words for yes and no never change, regardless of which question they are answering.

This happens in Danish actually. Example:

Kan du lide is? (Do you like ice cream?)
Ja
Kan du ikke lide is? (Do you not like ice cream?)
Jo

So in Danish we have “ja” which means “yes” but “jo” is used instead when answering a negative question, so as to confirm what the negative question asked. This is kind of annoying in English cause if you ask “Do you not like ice cream?” then if you say “yes” does that mean “yes I like ice cream” or does it mean “yes I do not like ice cream”? That’s what “jo” disambiguates.

m8 literally everyone on the fediverse is an outlier 😅

It’s definitely not a problem in my own projects, but at work is a different story. With a huge project, compile times becomes a real slog.

Definitely useful and I think it compares pretty well to other tooling? My two biggest issues are compile times and “amnesia”. First of all, compile times because the feedback cycle can get really bad. But that’s not really rust-analyzer’s fault, that’s cargo/rustc.

But rust-analyzer also has this weird “amnesia”. Like if I have ran the checks and everything is good, I can go to definition and it will instantly bring me there. But if I make a small change and it starts running cargo check, it’s like it forgets everything until it’s done with cargo check. I wish it still allowed me to use what it knew before and go to definitions and give suggestions and such.

dozens of GB of disk use by Rust

I was well above 100GB the other day 😅. But I think there’s a problem with the setup as well

Tbf less than 15% said it was a problem and the others is either “it’s good” or “could be better”. I definitely still have a few grievances with rust-analyzer, it could be better.

Honestly I kinda wish the Rust devs would rather go and support a project like Redox OS and then maybe we can have less drama about all this.

Am I the only one that feels it’s a bit strange to have such safeguards in an AI model? I know most models aren’t available online but some models are available to download and run locally right? So what prevents me from just doing that if I wanted to get around the safeguards? I guess maybe they’re just doing it so that they can’t be somehow held legally responsible for anything the AI model might say?

No - in Italy you eat pizza with a knife and fork.

Source? Or is it just your impression?

Damn! If only someone could’ve predicted that Meta would eventually do something stupid like this! If only we had defederated from them from the start /s

Try writing “!” followed by a community name, see if it autocompletes. That’s how it works in lemmy-ui.

You’re welcome! :)

Your link goes to lemmy.world, which only works for users on lemmy.world. For everyone else who doesn’t use lemmy.world, you just get to lemmy.world where you are not logged in. So you need that kind of link to go to the community while still staying on your own instance.

It’s like if I linked to the Feddit.dk community like this instead of like this: !fedditdk@feddit.dk

deleted by creator

For the lazy:

!internetisbeautiful@lemm.ee

!creepywikipedia@lemmy.world

!til@lemmy.world

!trendingcommunities@feddit.nl

!superbowl@lemmy.world for the lazy

Just be sure to find another job before quitting. Always easier to find a job when you already have one.

All the time i spent playing Dota, Starcraft, battlefield and smash melee says nope.

Sure, if your metric is hours of gameplay per dollar spent. But that’s no way to rate a video game if you ask me.

For instance I would rate The Talos Principle or Disco Elysium as much better games than, say, World of Warcraft, despite the fact that I played wow much more than the former two. But the story of those two games are just far more interesting and the games have left a much more impactful, lasting impression on me even though I don’t play them any more.

The line is at least very blurred with moderation. One person’s moderation is another person’s censorship.