There’s also the article, you lazy bones

“Less touching of the system, less chance of breaking something” seems to be the idea.

Wolfs

I mean aren’t those countries made up by the former colonialists, they should probably be paying the og natives

Nobody was arguing that colonialism didn’t play a part, even though the article does mention that the loans had pretty favourable terms.

It sounds like a bit of a shitshow even without US involvement

The republic was politically unstable, experiencing civil wars, rebellions, and insurrections by liberals and conservatives. From 1827 to 1829, it fell into a civil war between conservatives who supported Arce and liberals who opposed him. Liberal politician Francisco Morazán led the liberals to victory, and was elected president in 1830. The republic descended into a second civil war from 1838 to 1840, by the end of which the states of Central America declared independence and the federal republic ceased to exist.

Historians have attributed the country’s political instability to its federal system of government and its economic struggles. Agricultural exports were insufficient and the federal government was unable to repay its foreign loans, despite favorable terms. Central America’s economic troubles were caused in part by the federal government’s inability to collect taxes and inadequate interstate infrastructure.

My guy, what does this have to do with my comment

What is this even in relation to?

The “don’t step on me” people who talk about the right to bear arms often celebrate the police and the military

I think this is directed at the right

Criticism of China? Sinophobia.

Criticism of Israel? Antisemitism.

Where does it end, Yurophobia next?

Well one is way more recent

Used to be the case, but nowadays it’s fine to use Discover and the GNOME’s app store (according to the devs on Reddit). The wiki seems to be out of date, which is unfortunately common with openSUSE.

Last edited in 2019. Now at least according to devs on Reddit it’s fine to use a GUI since Packagekit knows how to do zypper dup

Actually that’s not the case anymore. Packagekit can do zypper dup now.

Flatpaks really aren’t for terminal stuff, it at least wasn’t the intention

I mean it’s fairly straightforward when considering if “uncontrolled outdoor access” has dangers and harms to the cats

Uncontrolled outdoor access allows these natural behaviors, but it also poses a number of significant health and welfare risks, and the overall benefits of the performance of these behaviors is unknown.

But if you’re not willing to take their word for it, there’s other people talking about those dangers too

https://www.orangecountync.gov/1331/Safety-concerns-for-free-roaming-cats

https://www.avma.org/resources-tools/avma-policies/free-roaming-owned-cats

https://stories.tamu.edu/news/2023/10/19/how-free-roaming-cats-impact-wildlife-disease-transmission/

And so on and so on.

Replying to singular lines or small parts of comments makes the whole comment a disjointed mess. If you aren’t even willing to accept the multitude of studies and animal welfare organisations saying there’s an (obvious) increased risk from unsupervised roaming, then there’s nothing much to go on from here. If you feel there’s more positives and can support that with studies, I’d be interested to see that. If it’s just your emotional take, I understand that, but it’s just not very responsible way to handle a pet.

If you read the conclusion it does say it would be better to keep your cats indoors because of all the associated risks. You just seem to be in denial about the whole thing and I don’t blame you, it’s a really emotional topic for some reason.

I mean study after study gives the obvious conclusion that of course it comes with increased risk and of course you wouldn’t be there to help them, it’s unsupervised and unrestricted roaming, so duh. And of course it negatively affects the surrounding wildlife, you’re introducing lots of cats to places that had a lot less if any cats.

But there’s such a strong emotional aspect to it that I just can’t understand that makes people pretend stupid or just refuse to accept the obvious conclusion.

The study mentions that risk factors of outdoor keeping vary by location. There is no mention of historic risk and therefore no assessment how these may have evolved.

You really need a study to say to you that thousands of years ago cars weren’t as much of a risk?

With the open kernel modules you don’t have to do that anymore