So many words…

to

oh god please no

wth is all that coloring [in the design samples]

Stop allowing full unfettered access

There’s a decline button. At least privacy settings don’t repeatedly come up again (what this post is about).

Better flood them with interested users than ask for thumbs up on a ticket.

Steam

• offers services
• takes a 30% cut on products sold on the Steam Store
• offers free Steam keys, within broad limitations, for you to sell on other stores, or distribute in other ways (free review copies, etc)
• requires you to sell the product at the same price even when Steam is not involved (different store, no Steam integration)
• the implication is that this also applies to discounts (I don’t know for sure myself, and the post does not give evidence of it, but the “fair to Steam” implies it)

You could sell a product DRM-free on your own website 30% cheaper, and get the same money, while providing a cheaper, DRM-free alternative. Steam currently denies that, restricting your choices. You can still sell it on your website at the same price, of course, and the customer still has a choice.

I think what feels unfair or maybe immoral is that they make demands, even requirements, upon your decisions and distributions that do not involve them at all. They’re taking your product hostage. And they can do so because they’re so big you can’t not publish on their storefront too if you want reach.

We want to move down to the next line (line feed) but also to the beginning of that line (carriage return) after all.

Unless you open it in Excel. In which case bad things will happen no matter what you have in the CSV…

When did you first hear of Godot?*

I don’t know man. Required field. No fitting option. Guess I’ll leave.

They bought Java (not javascript)

They bought Sun, which “owned” Java and JavaScript.

The trademark was originally issued to Sun Microsystems on 6 May 1997, and was transferred to Oracle when they acquired Sun in 2009.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript#Trademark

not found for me too

None of the URL parents have content. The root page only has a placeholder page with an image and placeholder text.

A Python-specific question is better suited to the !python@programming.dev community instead of the general programming one.

I’ll use a gif with each frame being a different country flag. Then I can access them by frame index.

Let’s call the axes g o and d.

The link is broken. Looks like code was accidentally pasted there.

https://lukasatkinson.de/2025/net-negative-cursor/%20%20%20%20let%20mut%20bytes%20=%20vec![0u8;%20len%20as%20usize];%20%20%20%20buf.read_exact(&mut%20bytes)?%3B++++++++%2F%2F+Sanitize+control+characters+++++let+sanitized_bytes%3A+Vec%3Cu8%3E+=+bytes.into_iter%28%29+++++++++.filter%28%7C&b%7C+b+%3E=+32+%7C%7C+b+%3D%3D+9+%7C%7C+b+%3D%3D+10+%7C%7C+b+%3D%3D+13%29+%2F%2F+Allow+space%2C+tab%2C+newline%2C+carriage+return++++.collect%28%29%3B

404 Page Not Found
The page you have requested does not exist. Would you like to visit the start page?

Cleaned up link: https://lukasatkinson.de/2025/net-negative-cursor/

Marketing-speak, not saying much at all. Not even a hint in what they “discovered”, what they plan to change, or plan to do. No acknowledgement of previous issues, making me doubt the “working with the incredible global community” as pure marketing-speak.

Can you be more specific? What in what they present is bad use of AI?

What makes you think anyone blindly trusted it?

They pointed out how it was almost correct, and the two places they had to correct. Obviously, they verified it.

There and at other times, they talked about similar approaches of generating a starting point rather than “blindly trusting” or anything like that.

Blazor allows JavaScript like interactions, allows the developer to write in C# but gets rendered serverside

Blazor can compile .NET to Webassembly and run that in the web-browser.

Probably because it’s much simpler to integrate than Jenkins.

Their own CI system ‘Actions’ is in open alpha.

Honestly, I’m glad they didn’t use Jenkins. Managing it is a convoluted mess. (I don’t have experience with Woodpecker CI nor with Forgejo Actions in particular, though.)

• https://docs.codeberg.org/ci/actions/
• https://codeberg.org/actions/meta
• https://docs.codeberg.org/ci/#using-codeberg’s-instance-of-woodpecker-ci
• Forgejo Actions docs documents their own CI called Actions.
• Forgejo Actions announcement from 2023

Thank you for sharing. Your views and experience were very interesting and insightful.

I wanted to pick up on some of your points, but I can’t seem to grasp fitting responses or meaningful thought continuations.