I hope you mean broodwar and not just the original release

I dont’t think I’ve ever played an eidos game that actually worked and ran out of the box. Such a bad experience.

FF7 was hot garbage

I dont have an answer for you sorry, but i might be able to point you somewhere you might find inspiration to find your own answer

If there is a lemmy equivalent of the subreddits maliciouscompliance, pettyrevenge, prorevenge, or nuclearrevenge or you are willing to go look at the originals, theres a lot of stories that are entertaining and will be a mine of ideas

I met this guy that WALKED across Canada for this same cause.

Hes a great singer too!

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/the-national-michael-yellowlees-cross-canada-walk-1.5322480

Now I’ll pull out all your pubic haaaaaaiiiiiiiiiir🎶

I simply cannot agree more

I tried finding others but kept coming back to the one. Helped that i read a lot of fantasy and they used a lot of content i was already familiar with, but it was also the remorting system that entranced me

Riftsmud.net:4000

And mutually beneficially so does UBI et al

Okay I’m done with this you are just being obstinate or intentionlly trolling me

Okay Ojay okay. Help me out. Why are you claiming that this is the question?

“The question was: how does someone find out something is peer reviewed”

Please literally show where you see this being asked. It was not asked in the top comment, nor is it necessary to ask. I don’t understand why you feel it is silly or unnecessary as it is very clearly used for a specific purpose when i read the top comment.

Again you are wrong. It was not the question of the top comment you responded to. That was a follow up question that is irrelevant because the comment you that started this discussion cleanly clearly and unambiguously removed any need to discuss how to find out if something is peer reviewed by the first words they started the comment with.

If it is peer reviewed…

And they gave an example of something that you could do to further verify a peer reviewed paper. You can replicate the experiment and get the same results but then offered an example where there might be a problem with only reproducing the results, to them anyway

No one said it wasn’t correct… Why did you even bring that up?!? You accused the person you first replied to it, describing a process that isn’t the peer review process, skipping that they used the process they described only on something that is already peer reviewed…

I was(perhaps a poor attempt) trying to be a bit silly but pointing out a mistake you made accusing them of something they didnt do. But you just dont want to let it go and keep drilling deeper. Its quite surprising to me you can’t just say, oh whoops, and carry on

Your reasoning doesn’t matter if it’s being applied to the wrong problem.

This is not about OP.

Okay i laughed

Has nothing to do with OPs question. You missed the very first sentence to the comment your first responded to

if its peer reviewed.

You kinda glossed right over that didnt you? Maybe an edit is in your future?

I dont have an answer other than vet with an authority you trust (be it wikipedia, a teacher a friend, a parent)

But this is not a stupid question. Its probably the most important question when making a decision in this modern techno era to have an answer for yourself

Bringing an illegal substance to work is even dumber. Even if it is legal its pretty dumb to bring it to work

Chapmans is my go to grocery store ice cream now that breyers has been garbage for more than a few years. It’s not sending, but it’s at least icecream

That was an excellent execution