Show me an equivalent to Active Directory on Linux.

And no, allowing users to manage their machine themselves will break their entire computer and every server they can access. Most users never even read a warning if they can just click “OK”.

The problem is that the second option also requires you to go to work in a tuxedo.

Only a small niche of companies allow you to not work in a tuxedo.

So complaining about tuxedos at a job (in this universe) is just dumb.

It is more than functional for corporate, seeing how the majority of companies run entirely on it.

Memes are fine.

But this is straight up propaganda trying to disguise itself as a joke.

If I’d even encounter a dev like the one from the post. I’d laugh in his face and wish him good luck on finding a job that caters to their niche needs.

Nobody said outliers don’t exist.

What we are saying is that the majority (like 80% or something) are run entirely on Windows. No matter what the Linux fanboys want to believe.

You could have had some great points, but the fact that you use “microslop” unironically shows how much of a bias you have. Meaning your points might as well not exist.

You sound like an anti-vaxxer blaming everything wrong with their life on big pharma.

Every single business running Windows computers (which is about all of them) will have an Active Directory running on Windows.

Every company I worked for only ever had a handful of Linux servers and the majority of Windows servers.

Microsoft revenue generated $26.7 billion in one quarter from its Licensing, and even though a lot of it was through cloud, a lot of it also came through self hosted Windows servers.

You live in a bubble if you think nobody is using Windows server.

Seems like you didn’t learn anything about it, did you?

It is only hidden because too many non-programmers become hysterical whenever AI is mentioned.

In a rational world, it wouldn’t need to be hidden.

It is more nuance than rationality.

There are plenty of reasons to hate on AI. But in the end they are just tools to automate things. It depends entirely on how it is being used. With enough effort and most importantly checking the output, you can create things faster while still keeping the same quality as before.

Calling anything that even slightly touched an LLM “slop” and crawling in a fetus position while crying is a lot less rational. These people have no idea about the real world.

TLDR

You assumed wrong … again.

The only thing you are doing is proving their point.

You understand less from the sentence being said than you think. You only assume you were correct because you also listened with half an ear to their explanation.

You assume they don’t know all of you based on preconceived notions.

Both of them die instantly

Which is dumb in a high fantasy setting, imo.

Using low magic is a crutch for the DM in order to control the actions of the PCs.

It is much easier to manage mundane actions than it is to manage actions fueled by wild magic. But they lead to less interesting stories.

I have much more fun DMing a setting like old Netheril. The stuff the PCs can do blow my mind. You just need to be able to fly by the seat of your pants.

Nah, plenty of geeky online stores in all places around the world.

But they do tend to have a limited selection of Star Trek shirts compared to Star Wars.