• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 20th, 2023

help-circle

  • That’s horrible for muscle memory, every time I switch desk/keyboard I have to re-learn the position of the home/end/delete/PgUp/PgDn keys.

    I got used to Ctrl-a / Ctrl-e and it became second nature, my hands don’t have to fish for extra keys, to the point that it becomes annoying when a program does not support that. Some map Ctrl-a to “Select all” so, for input fields where the selection is one line, I’d rather Ctrl-a then left/right to go to the beginning/end than fish for home/end, wherever they are.


    • Alt-delete deletes the whole word before cursor
    • Alt-d deletes the whole word after cursor
    • Ctrl-k deletes (kill) everything after the cursor

    Whatever is deleted is stored in the “killring” and can be pasted(yanked) back with Ctrl-y (like someone else already mentioned), consecutive uses of Alt-delete/Alt-d add to the killring.

    • Alt-b / Alt-f moves one word backwards / forwards
    • Alt-t swaps (translocates) the current word with the previous one
    • Ctrl-_ undo last edit operation

    All those bindings are the same as in emacs.

    Also, normally Ctrl-d inserts the end-of-file character, and typically can be used to close an active shell session or when you have some other interpreter open in the terminal for interactive input.


  • That quote was in the context of simply separating values with newlines (and the list also included “your language’s split or lines function”).

    Technically you don’t even need awk/sed/fzf, just a loop in bash doing read would allow you to parse the input one line at a time.

    while read line; do 
       echo $line # or whatever other operation
    done < whateverfile
    

    Also, those manpages are a lot less complex than the documentation for C# or Nushell (or bash itself), although maybe working with C#/nushell/bash is “easy when you’re already intuitively familiar with them”. I think the point was precisely the fact that doing that is easy in many different contexts because it’s a relatively simple way to separate values.


  • For the record, you mention “the limitations of the number of inodes in Unix-like systems”, but this is not a limit in Unix, but a limit in filesystem formats (which also extends to Windows and other systems).

    So it depends more on what the filesystem is rather than the OS. A FAT32 partition can only hold 65,535 files (2^16), but both ext4 and NTFS can have up to 4,294,967,295 (2^32). If using Btrfs then it jumps to 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 (2^64).