It’s a joke. Apps have defined permissions already allowed on install and some of them have too many things set to allow like home or host access. Also, changing any permission requires restarting the app. It’s heading in the right direction, but it has a looooong way to go to catch up with macOS, let alone Android and iOS.
macOS has nailed it*, even though it’s still not as good as iOS or Android, but leagues and bounds better than Windows and especially Linux.
ETC: *sandboxing/permission system
Even if this was genuine, it’s playing way too nicely in the AfD’s favor who is notorious for being a neo-nazi party in Germany. It sounds too much like something NSDAP would have done as well.
Here!
https://protonvpn.com/blog/apple-ios-vulnerability-disclosure/
https://mullvad.net/en/help/using-mullvad-app-on-ios#vulnerabilities
Those remain unpatched btw and have been around since iOS 14 or so.
I was with you there until you mentioned an industry self-regulating itself. That never works, and the best example for it is the American economy 😵💫
Heck, I’m paying $7.5! Prices across the Atlantic are WILD
That’s true and is the reason why I said “moderators are (partially) there …”.
Depends on your perspective I guess. The way I see it: Moderators are (partially) there to limit the spread of hate so if you are a hate spreader, you would thrive without moderation, but if you are a hate receiver, you’re better off when moderation rules are enforced.
Also called moderators elsewhere. Without those, the internet would be unusable for anyone not a cishet white Christian fundamentalist.
Ironically, this one is better designed than their current one lmao.
deleted by creator
“Is set to find”? They obviously have mental problems. If my identity was the target of a worldwide hate campaign, I’d also be mentally ill.
There is also the possibility that some governments would crack down on encryption much more than they already do if E2EE was on by default.
I don‘t know where you read their call to monitoring chats. They‘re requesting making spamming others harder and requiring more steps.
This doesn’t address the issue I pointed out with recommending people switch away from Firefox.
Have you tried registering an account through the Tor browser? If they banned you on that as well, then that’s either creepy as hell, or something is wrong with your setup.
Anything that says their website is broken because Firefox is automatically discredited in my book, especially when they recommend switching away from it.
In addition to all of the arguments brought up by the other commenters against Brave’s blatant lies in this ad, Firefox is deployed in school/corporate environments where compatibility is critical - especially for a web engine that isn’t popular, so they can’t be going around enabling stuff that would break websites on people’s computers in a critical setting, for example during a lesson at school and in front of students.
Mozilla is flawed, but Brave Software is at best just as bad. At least Mozilla isn’t going around spreading absolute lies about competitors.
It’s all for self-defense. What are you on? (/s)
I love how their blog posts say so much and so little at the same time - almost like they’ve been generated by a an LLM lmfao. I read the blog post and still couldn’t find out on what data their model is trained on.