Kamala Harris running a damn near flawless campaign, with just a month 1/2 of campaigning. She’s been holding rallies nonstop with Tim Walz & not making her talking points about her race or gender like Hillary. She’s offering expanded healthcare, reinvestments back into public housing, wants to take on corporate greed, protect reproductive rights and chose a pro labor, pro education running mate.

Yet, she’s either barely leading or ties in most polls with a guy that:

Is a convicted felon.

Liable Sexual Predator.

Gets sentenced in November.

Has several more pending cases.

Increased Drone Strikes by 300%. (Joe Biden dosent use drones anymore).

Illegally killed an Iranian General unprovoked with a missle strike.

Increased tensions in Israel/Palestine with the Abraham Accords.

Wants war with Mexico (his words).

Tried to coup Venezuela.

Will bend the knee for Netanyahu’s potential war with Iran.

Lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% (lowest in history).

Obvious tax cuts for the rich.

Told people to drink bleach during the pandemic.

Is the main driving force for America’s current division.

Constantly attacks marginalized groups.

Tried to steal the 2020 election (Find Me 11,000 votes in GA).

Did Fake Elector Slates to pressure Mike Pence to not certify the 2020 election.

Caused a riot on the capitol that lead to his OWN supporters dying.

Just got washed by Harris in the last debate, was completely unprepared on anything but immigration (“I have concepts of a plan”).

And so much more. So seriously what is it? Is it just the attraction to bigotry/racism? Is it to end “wokeness”. Is it because Kamala is a woman of color? You can’t use the both sides argument like Hilary or Biden, Kamala is the obvious better choice. Could you imagine if Kamala had as much baggage as Trump? The media would lose their minds.

Seriously, how the f*** is this guy still in the race?

    • Sylaran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not arguing for or against just saying that’s really not a policy just a lack of policy

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        A pack of policy is still policy. My policy is not to murder people. That’s still a policy.

        • Sylaran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          So to clarify, having no plan to stop shootings is better than having a plan to stop shootings? I’d personally argue that any plan is better than no plan

          • Kaboom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Because it’s just an excuse to disarm the people. Mostly targeting the disadvantaged, namely minorities.