• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    1·
    8 months ago

    If we are talking about banking sites, and - say - we discuss the security measures needed on them, nobody would think to include phishing sites into the discussion, because it’s meaningless.

    Incorrect. Learn to recognize ‘spoofing’ and ‘phishing’

    was obviously referring to the businesses which run online casinos

    Incorrect

    OP was clearly talking about actual gambling businesses.

    Incorrect. OP clearly wrote “online casinos”.

    You clearly have a guilty conscious about the money you earned from gamblers. Or you are being paid for this shilling.

    The problem with online casinos is that they are associated with a huge number of scams.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        1·
        8 months ago

        if someone is creating a new standard for banking sites

        Not part of the discussion. You are straining pretty hard in your efforts to “win”.

        And online casinos don’t include fake online casinos.

        Yes, they do. The clue is in the name.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            2·
            8 months ago

            The point is simple “industry” doesn’t contain the scammers who try to abuse it.

            It does. To illustrate this I linked to a bank website containing advice on combating phishing.

            Here’s the definition I’m happy with.

            Legitimate casinos = established businesses in the casino industry

            Fake casinos = scammers

            Online casinos = legitimate casinos + fake casinos

            Combined because users find it hard to tell the difference.