• Mereo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    154
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What the hell?!?!?! This is a server OS! It needs to be as light as possible and for the sake of server stability and security, admins carefully choose the installed apps. Microsoft can’t just install new applications on a whim.

    This is fuged up.

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      110
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      People in this thread seem to be missing this point.

      This is windows server, not windows 11. The consequences is not “I’ll have an annoying taskbar icon on my home computer”, this is enterprise level interference that could affect large systems and thousands of users.

      Linux Mint isn’t an alternative to windows server.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep. I no longer have to administer Windows servers (everything I do is serverless these days) but I did for many years.

        Adding anything to a server without vetting it against policies is a huge no no. Back when I was doing it, a big part of our monthly update deployment was updating the test environment first so we knew we weren’t about to break a bunch of shit for us and our customers. Not just “does this brick Windows server”, but “do our applications still function” (usually yes, but the answer was no on several occasions over shit smaller than this).

        I don’t know what adding copilot does. Is it going to accidentally break some custom application by accident because it’s tied directly into the system? Is it going to report shit that I’ve already opted out of due to our data policies and possibly fuck up our audit compliance because of government regulations (defense, medical, and energy sectors have huge responsibilities in that area, just don’t ask how I know)? How does it interact with our in-house developed software?

        Fuck, I dunno. That sounds like a nightmare for infrastructure and ops, several managers, government regulators, and a payday for legal.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For sure, if you need paid support (which if you aren’t a tech giant, a fledgling startup, or a system with no need for uptime metrics, you probally do) the you have:

        • SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (aka SLES and only still Libre option in this category unfortunately)
        • Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
        • Ubuntu are

        if don’t need paid support then Debian, OpenSuse, Rocky, or Fedora are all good picks.