FlumPHP@programming.dev to Dungeons and Dragons@lemmy.world · edit-211 months agoDungeons & Dragons Publisher Denies Selling Game To Chinese Firm: Here’s What To Know [was: Hasbro Seeks to Sell IP “DND” and Has Had Preliminary Contact with Tencent]pandaily.comexternal-linkmessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up1194arrow-down110cross-posted to: gaming@beehaw.orggames@lemmy.world
arrow-up1184arrow-down1external-linkDungeons & Dragons Publisher Denies Selling Game To Chinese Firm: Here’s What To Know [was: Hasbro Seeks to Sell IP “DND” and Has Had Preliminary Contact with Tencent]pandaily.comFlumPHP@programming.dev to Dungeons and Dragons@lemmy.world · edit-211 months agomessage-square139fedilinkcross-posted to: gaming@beehaw.orggames@lemmy.world
minus-squareLibertyLizard@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoIsn’t that more of a license under which games can be developed than a game unto itself? Or did I misunderstand? Also, I want it to be managed by the community, not some law firm.
minus-squareMoobythegoldensock@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoYes, it’s a license. But nothing is to stop you for making your own free community-driven game under that license.
Isn’t that more of a license under which games can be developed than a game unto itself? Or did I misunderstand? Also, I want it to be managed by the community, not some law firm.
Yes, it’s a license. But nothing is to stop you for making your own free community-driven game under that license.