Does anyone here have a BOOX e-paper tablet? I’m a big fan of e-paper devices—I love my Pebble smartwatch, Kindle Paperwhite, and Light Phone II. I’ve been eyeing the Tab Ultra C for quite a while, and I am considering the pros and cons. Mostly, I intend to use it for browsing the web and maybe some light note taking and document writing.

  • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I would only get one if it also had a backlit display. Preferably amber

    This article has some useful considerations.

    Happy shopping.

      • Keith@lemmy.zip
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        What? You absolutely can. Look at… Every recent model of kindle.

        • zzzzz@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          E-ink displays are opaque. The Kindles with illumination use side-lighting with a layer of plastic that guides the light across the surface of the device. They are effectively front-lit using LEDs situated around the perimeter of the screen.

          • Overzeetop@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The use of the term backlight is common, but even Amazon refers to it as a “front light” (it’s edge-lit, of course, as you say). Bit like using a floppy disc as the “save” icon, or walling wireless networks “wi-fi” despite having nothing to to with “fidelity”. We all know what it means.

            • zzzzz@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              We all know what it means.

              Except for me, apparently. I’ll have to update my vocabulary: backlight can mean front light.

              • Overzeetop@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I get it…it’s hard to say something you know is incorrect, accuracy of language going to shit and other modern problems, and I feel that. I think of it as more of a “internal lighting that illuminates the device interface.” In dealing with non-technical people on a daily basis, I find it’s much more productive to allow/ignore this sort of colloquialism unless it’s that specific thing I’m trying to fix/undo/explain. I barely even flinch now when people refer to the large box on their deck as the “CPU.” ;-)

        • niucllos@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I thought they were all side-lit? Which is functionally the same imo but technically different

          • Keith@lemmy.zip
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not sure about that, I think the term backlit is applicable there even if technically incorrect.

        • wagoner@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I deleted my comment as I realized it was not the same thing as you were asking for. Sorry!

          • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Hey, no worries bud. This is the internet and we’re all strangers! You don’t know anything but I appreciate your consideration!