Zerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoYouTubefile.coffeeimagemessage-square282fedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down159
arrow-up11.36Karrow-down1imageYouTubefile.coffeeZerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square282fedilink
minus-squarehemko@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down5·edit-21 year agoGoogle doesn’t deserve your money. You don’t pay a bully so that they bully you a little bit less
minus-squareMentalEdge@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·1 year agoThat’s a very bad analogy. That logic would lead to defect-defect scenarios in all but the rarest of cases. By all means, defect when warranted, but if a bad company changing course doesn’t net rewards, why would corps ever do anything other than the worst possible, taking as many users down with them as they can snare?
minus-squarePipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoHere is an alternative Piped link(s): That logic would lead to defect-defect scenarios in all but the rarest of cases. Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Google doesn’t deserve your money.
You don’t pay a bully so that they bully you a little bit less
That’s a very bad analogy.
That logic would lead to defect-defect scenarios in all but the rarest of cases.
By all means, defect when warranted, but if a bad company changing course doesn’t net rewards, why would corps ever do anything other than the worst possible, taking as many users down with them as they can snare?
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
That logic would lead to defect-defect scenarios in all but the rarest of cases.
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.