Perhaps this is a cultural thing, but doublespeak seems to be prevalent even in casual conversation

  • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not being hyperbolic, but almost every single time I have to speak with or am spoken to by a manager/GM at work. HR at all large companies I have ever worked for as well.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work for/with a religiously-affiliated charitable organization, so doublespeak is pretty constant. Worse, not only do people use it but they also police the speech of those around them.

  • VonReposti@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every time I turn to politics. Our ex justice minister once said:

    Surveillance is freedom

    I’m not kidding. Word for word, that’s what he said.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I assume you mean just subtly mentioning something without outright saying it. That’s just a social skill, since some things are better said that way.

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      On the other hand, equivocation is the bastion of cowards and simpletons.

    • ricecake@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look at their actions, not their words specifically.

      It’s a culture where being unkind is particularly unacceptable, not specifically where you’re not allowed to be honest or forthright.

      You’re allowed to not like someone, but telling someone you dislike them is needlessly unkind, so you just politely decline to interact with them.
      You’d “hate to intrude”, or “be a bother”. If it’s pushed, you’ll “consider it and let them know”.

      Negative things just have to be conveyed in the kindest way possible, not that they can’t be conveyed.

  • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t know. I take most things that people say at face-value.

    I don’t have the time or energy to interpret double-meanings. Say what you mean & mean what you say.

      • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, they might get mad, but that’s on them. If they said what they actually meant, things would go a lot smoother.

        Communicate clearly instead of expecting me to do codebreaking.

        • socsa@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Once you achieve a certain level of not giving a fuck, just repeat their statement back to then in plain language and they will usually either storm off, freeing you from the conversation, or they will get the point, freeing you from at least the tedious part of the conversation.

          • nik282000@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is my favorite way to deal with management.

            So you want me to disable a safety feature to help speed up production?