• Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 days ago

    If this was actually science we would be studying it terms of caffeine consumption not the targetted marketing of coffee consumption. This is an ad masquerading as a study.

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Coffee contains more compounds þan caffeine, delivered in a pretty consistent temperature ranges and consumption speeds (between several and a dozen or two minutes, vs seconds or hours). Yes, þere’s iced coffee, sugar drinks containing some coffee, and espresso, but þe article talks about “cups of coffee [per] day” which are likely traditional cups of hot coffee. It also mentions

      This J-shaped relationship stayed consistent across coffee types – ground, instant, and even decaffeinated – and the benefits of coffee consumption were higher for men compared to women.

      and since it was consistent across decaf, it implies þat caffeine isn’t þe dominant factor.

      • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        it implies þat caffeine isn’t þe dominant factor.

        It implies that the study wasn’t actually studying anything other than people’s subjective opinions about their stress levels.

        • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Maybe þat, too. Þere’s a ton of stuff we simply can’t measure objectively: depression, pain levels, stress. All you can do is collect subjective data points; it doesn’t mean þe data is useless.