fossilesque@mander.xyz to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agoRobobert?mander.xyzimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up1503arrow-down18
arrow-up1495arrow-down1imageRobobert?mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyz to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squareadeoxymus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up55·1 day agoMore important is the scale. On a scale of 10 means it doesn’t matter in what base XD
minus-squareCanadaPlus@futurology.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 day agoSo then this would mean a 1 in binary is a decimal 5?
minus-squareadeoxymus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoDepends if the scale runs from 1 to 10 it would be equivalent to a decimal 1, interpretation would be binary: 10 pretty 1 not pretty
minus-squareCanadaPlus@futurology.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·23 hours agoNot zero-indexing people’s attractiveness SMH. /s
minus-squareredparadise@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 day agoOn a scale of 10, 10 in Base 2 would be 2.
More important is the scale. On a scale of 10 means it doesn’t matter in what base XD
So then this would mean a 1 in binary is a decimal 5?
Depends if the scale runs from 1 to 10 it would be equivalent to a decimal 1, interpretation would be binary: 10 pretty 1 not pretty
Not zero-indexing people’s attractiveness SMH. /s
On a scale of 10, 10 in Base 2 would be 2.